Literature DB >> 6152057

The effect of pimozide on variable-interval performance: a test of the 'anhedonia' hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics.

M J Morley, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

A quantitative behavioural test system based on Herrnstein's (1970) equation was used to test a prediction derived from the "anhedonia" hypothesis of neuroleptic action, that pimozide should increase the value of the behavioural parameter KH (the reinforcement frequency needed to maintain the half-maximal response rate in variable-interval schedules). On the basis of theoretical considerations, it was shown that the equation implies that a drug which exerts such an effect on KH must have a more profound suppressant effect on performance maintained by low reinforcement frequencies than on performance maintained by high reinforcement frequencies. Fifteen rats were trained under variable-interval 10-s and variable-interval 100-s schedules, and the effect of pimozide (0.125, 0.25, 0.33, and 0.5 mg/kg) was tested on performance maintained under both schedules in a dose-dependent manner, and there was no tendency for the drug to exert a greater effect on performance maintained under the lower reinforcement frequency. These results do not provide any evidence that the effect of pimozide on variable-interval performance is due to an "anti-hedonic effect"; rather, they are compatible with the hypothesis that pimozide impairs the capacity to respond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6152057     DOI: 10.1007/BF00431461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  21 in total

1.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; P Bevan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Catecholamine theories of reward: a critical review.

Authors:  R A Wise
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-08-25       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  A Ettenberg; G F Koob; F E Bloom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: III. The effect of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; D Karras
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  The effect of pentobarbitone on variable-interval performance: analysis in terms of Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  H V Ruddle; M J Morley; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  The role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning.

Authors:  R J Beninger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  16 in total

1.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  Z Zhang; J F Rickard; K Asgari; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Evidence for an involvement of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurones in the maintenance of operant behaviour by positive reinforcement.

Authors:  M A Wogar; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  DSP4 alters the effect of d-amphetamine on variable-interval performance: analysis in terms of Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  M J Morley; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.

Authors:  G M Heyman; D L Kinzie; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Response decrement patterns after neuroleptic and non-neuroleptic drugs.

Authors:  D J Sanger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Complex motor and sensorimotor functions of striatal and accumbens dopamine: involvement in instrumental behavior processes.

Authors:  J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.