Literature DB >> 3083455

Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.

G M Heyman, D L Kinzie, L S Seiden.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of chlorpromazine and pimozide on reinforced responding. In each session, rats were exposed to a series of five variable-interval reinforcement schedules. The response requirement was a lever press, the reward was a small portion of water, and the reinforcement rate varied from about 20 to 660 reinforcers per hour. Response rate was a negatively accelerated function of reinforcement rate, and the relationship between the two variables was described by the equation for a rectangular hyperbola (the matching law). One parameter of the hyperbola is equivalent to the asymptotic response rate and the other parameter is equivalent to the rate of reinforcement that maintains a one-half asymptotic response rate. Chlorpromazine (0.75-3.0 mg/kg) and pimozide (0.1-0.4 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased response rates. At low doses, the response rate decreases were, for the most part, restricted to the low reinforcement rate schedules. In contrast, the highest dose tested decreased response rates at both low and high reinforcement rates. The patterns of response rate decreases resulted in dose-dependent changes in the parameters of the matching law equation. The shifts in the matching law parameters were discussed in terms of the motoric and motivational interpretations of neuroleptic-induced response rate changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3083455     DOI: 10.1007/bf00180837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance.

Authors:  T N Tombaugh; J Tombaugh; H Anisman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of chlorpromazine, meprobamate, pentobarbital and morphine on self-stimulation.

Authors:  J OLDS; R P TRAVIS
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  A note on fitting Herrnstein's equation.

Authors:  C Lee Wetherington; T R Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs.

Authors:  I Creese; D R Burt; S H Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia.

Authors:  A Ettenberg; G F Koob; F E Bloom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Catecholamines and self-stimulation: reward and performances effects dissociated.

Authors:  K B Franklin
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: III. The effect of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; H V Ruddle; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; D Karras
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  A Towell; R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Complex motor and sensorimotor functions of striatal and accumbens dopamine: involvement in instrumental behavior processes.

Authors:  J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of gestational exposure to methylmercury and dietary selenium on reinforcement efficacy in adulthood.

Authors:  Miranda N Reed; Kelly M Banna; Wendy D Donlin; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  Effects of accumbens DALA microinjections on brain stimulation reward and behavioral activation in intact and 6-OHDA treated rats.

Authors:  P L Johnson; J R Stellar
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.