Literature DB >> 6695003

Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.

C R Gallistel, D Karras.   

Abstract

The reward summation function is the plot of self-stimulation performance as a function of the number of pulses in a train of fixed duration. It has previously been shown that drugs that impair performance compress this curve but do not shift it laterally; whereas when the reinforcing efficacy is reduced by reducing current intensity, the curve shifts laterally. The amount of the shift is a measure of the magnitude of a drug's effect upon reinforcing efficacy. We report here that pimozide shifts the curve to the right in a dose-dependent manner, indicating an impairment of reinforcing efficacy, while amphetamine shifts it to the left, indicating an enhancement of reinforcing efficacy. When the two drugs are given together their effects on the reward summation function cancel out. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that pimozide and amphetamine exert their effects on reinforcing efficacy via one and the same set of dopaminergic synapses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6695003     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90104-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  34 in total

1.  A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P Willner; D Sampson; G Phillips; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Functional implications of glutamatergic projections to the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Stefanie Geisler; Roy A Wise
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.353

4.  A pause in nucleus accumbens neuron firing is required to initiate and maintain feeding.

Authors:  Michael Krause; P Walter German; Sharif A Taha; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Roles for nigrostriatal--not just mesocorticolimbic--dopamine in reward and addiction.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  Role of brain dopamine in food reward and reinforcement.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Behavioral evidence of depolarization block of dopamine neurons after chronic treatment with haloperidol and clozapine.

Authors:  S M Boye; P P Rompré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Brain-stimulation reward thresholds raised by an antisense oligonucleotide for the M5 muscarinic receptor infused near dopamine cells.

Authors:  J S Yeomans; J Takeuchi; M Baptista; D D Flynn; K Lepik; J Nobrega; J Fulton; M R Ralph
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Phencyclidine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward: acute effects are not altered by repeated administration.

Authors:  W A Carlezon; R A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.