Literature DB >> 6056798

Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.

J A Nevin.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a discrete-trials, simultaneous discrimination procedure, with confusable stimuli such that asymptotic performance was about 85% correct. Trials were terminated if no response occurred within 2 sec of stimulus onset, so that probability of responding was free to vary. The schedule of reinforcement for correct responses was varied, with the following results: (1) there was no relation between frequency of reinforcement and accuracy of responding. (2) In extinction, the probability of responding fell to low levels, but accuracy remained roughly constant. (3) When reinforcement was available after a fixed number of trials or after a fixed number of correct responses, the probability of responding increased with successive trials after reinforcement, but accuracy was generally constant. (4) When every fifth correct response was reinforced, accuracy decreased immediately after reinforcement if the birds were required to respond on every trial.

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6056798      PMCID: PMC1338278          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Ratio reinforcement of matching behavior.

Authors:  J A NEVIN; W W CUMMING; T BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of multiple S delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  W N Schoenfeld; W W Cumming; E Hearst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effect of hunger on discriminated responding.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1952-01

6.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Comparison of three methods for obtaining psychophysical thresholds from the pigeon.

Authors:  T L Mentzer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

8.  Stimulus control in fixed ratio matching-to-sample.

Authors:  D E Mintz; D J Mourer; L S Weinberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  24 in total

1.  Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination performance.

Authors:  A Stubbs; W D Galloway
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedule control of matching-to-sample errors by children.

Authors:  N A Davidson; J G Osborne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Fixed-ratio reinforcement of spaced responding.

Authors:  G Bigelow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Generalization during acquisition, extinction, and transfer of matching with an adjustable comparison.

Authors:  L R Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Fixed-interval stimulus control.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.