Literature DB >> 16811455

Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination performance.

A Stubbs, W D Galloway.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a three-key chamber to peck one side key in the presence of a vertical line on the center key and to peck the other side key in the presence of a horizontal line. Correct choice responses were reinforced with food according to fixed- and variable-ratio, fixed-interval, and differential-reinforcement-of-long-latency schedules of reinforcement. For each schedule, the birds performed under each of two conditions: (1) each correct choice response produced a brief presentation of stimuli intermittently paired with food, then the next trial; (2) each correct choice response produced an intertrial interval only. For all schedules except one long latency schedule, response rates were higher under the condition of brief stimulus presentation than under the comparable control condition. Presentation of brief magazine stimuli increased choice accuracy. The amount of change in accuracy was correlated with the rate of food presentation. Performance under the schedules with highest food reinforcement rates showed no enhancement; performance under the schedules with the lowest reinforcement rates showed the greatest enhancement.

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811455      PMCID: PMC1333695          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  FACILITATION OF LARGE RATIO PERFORMANCE BY USE OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  OVERT "MEDIATING" BEHAVIOR DURING TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING.

Authors:  V G LATIES; B WEISS; R L CLARK; M D REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Complex response patterns during temporally spaced responding.

Authors:  W HODOS; G S ROSS; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Punishment of S delta responding in matching to sample by time out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER; J B APPEL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Intermittent reinforcement of matching to sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relations between patterns of responding and the presentation of stimuli under second-order schedules.

Authors:  L D Byrd; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contiguity of briefly presented stimuli with food reinforcement.

Authors:  A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Further observations on overt "mediating" behavior and the discrimination of time.

Authors:  V G Laties; B Weiss; A B Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fixed-ratio reinforcement of spaced responding.

Authors:  G Bigelow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Control of preference in children by conditioned positive reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Favell; J E Favell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Independence of stimulus discriminability from absolute rate of reinforcement in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.