Literature DB >> 5966616

Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal.

C C Perkins, R G Seymann, D J Levis, R Spencer.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1966        PMID： 5966616     DOI： 10.1037/h0023491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol        ISSN： 0022-1015


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A rate measure of the relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled shock.

Authors:  L Macdonald; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects on responding of mixed and multiple schedules of signalled and unsignalled response-dependent electric-shock delivery.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The double-alternative, double-start experimental apparatus: A new procedure for measuring preference.

Authors:  G B Biederman; J J Furedy; G A Heighington
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response-shock delay as a reinforcer in avoidance behavior.

Authors:  J O Benedict
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choosing between predictable shock schedules: Long- versus short-duration signals.

Authors:  P Badia; B Abbott; L Schoen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice for signaled over unsignaled shock as a function of signal length.

Authors:  B Abbott; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.