Literature DB >> 16811884

Response-shock delay as a reinforcer in avoidance behavior.

J O Benedict.   

Abstract

After rats received preliminary training to avoid shock on a discrete-trial retractable-bar avoidance procedure, the procedure was changed such that responses retracted the lever but did not affect the rate of shock. Responses only delayed the onset of shock. About half of the animals under these procedures responded consistently on almost 100% of the discrete-trial cycles over days. When short latencies maximized the response-shock delay, animals tended to make short-latency responses. When long latencies maximized the response-shock delay, animals tended to make long-latency responses. When all response latencies produced the same response-shock delay, animals made differing average-latency responses. And, when responses did not delay shock, most of the animals primarily engaged in shock-elicited responding while the other animals engaged in preshock responding.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811884      PMCID: PMC1333434          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice of a warning signal or no warning signal in an unavoidable shock situation.

Authors:  J S LOCKARD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-06

4.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled avoidance.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Method and theory in the study of avoidance.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; R L Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal.

Authors:  C C Perkins; R G Seymann; D J Levis; R Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08

10.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement.

Authors:  J W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The S-R issue: its status in behavior analysis and in Donahoe and Palmer's learning and complex behavior.

Authors:  J W Donahoe; D C Palmer; J E Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.