Literature DB >> 16811651

A rate measure of the relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled shock.

L Macdonald, A Baron.   

Abstract

Five rats were trained on a two-component multiple schedule with each component consisting of a two-link chain schedule. Differential response suppression in the initial links of the chain schedules was used as a measure of the relative aversiveness of events introduced into the subsequent terminal links. When unsignalled shock was scheduled in one terminal link and signalled shock in the other (in addition to equal numbers of food reinforcers), responding was suppressed to a greater degree in the initial link preceding the unsignalled-shock condition. Reversing the terminal-link positions of unsignalled shock and signalled shock led to a reversal of the differential response suppression in the initial links. These results confirm previous findings that signalled shock is less aversive than unsignalled shock and extend the generality of this phenomenon from choice measures to rate measures of aversiveness.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811651      PMCID: PMC1334049          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  MOTIVATIONAL ARTIFACT IN STANDARD FOOD-DEPRIVATION SCHEDULES.

Authors:  D G DAVENPORT; L R GOULET
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-04

2.  EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.

Authors:  S H CHUNG
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior.

Authors:  H WEINER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice of a warning signal or no warning signal in an unavoidable shock situation.

Authors:  J S LOCKARD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-06

5.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Immediate vs. delayed shock in T-maze performance.

Authors:  R K KNAPP; R H KAUSE; C C PERKINS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

7.  The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.

Authors:  C C PERKINS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Preference for warned shock: information and/or preparation.

Authors:  P Badia; S Suter; P Lewis
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1967-02

10.  Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal.

Authors:  C C Perkins; R G Seymann; D J Levis; R Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled shock-punishment.

Authors:  L Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.