Literature DB >> 16811915

Effects on responding of mixed and multiple schedules of signalled and unsignalled response-dependent electric-shock delivery.

N Hymowitz.   

Abstract

Responding in two rats was maintained under mixed and multiple variable-interval 35-sec variable-interval 35-sec food delivery schedules. Similar rates and patterns of responding occurred in each component of the two schedules. Mixed and multiple variable-interval 65-sec variable-interval 65-sec schedules of response-dependent shock delivery were super-imposed on the mixed and multiple baseline food schedules, respectively. In one component, a 5-sec stimulus was presented on the average of once every 65 sec. Offset of the stimulus arranged that the next response would produce shock. In the other component, no stimulus was presented during the 5-sec period. The mixed schedule of signalled and unsignalled dependent shock delivery yielded similar degrees of response suppression in each component, but the multiple schedule of shock delivery revealed differential degrees of response suppression. Considerably more suppression occurred in the component not associated with the preshock stimulus, thus implicating the discriminative functions of the correlated stimulus.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811915      PMCID: PMC1333470          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Choice of a warning signal or no warning signal in an unavoidable shock situation.

Authors:  J S LOCKARD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-06

2.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice of longer or stronger signalled shock over shorter or weaker unsignalled shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock.

Authors:  P Badia; C Coker; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Comparisons between variable-interval and fixed-interval schedules of electric shock delivery.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled shock-punishment.

Authors:  L Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Predictable vs. unpredictable shock: preference behavior and stomach ulceration.

Authors:  J A Gliner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec

8.  Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock.

Authors:  M E Seligman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-10

9.  Discriminated punishment: avoidable and unavoidable shock.

Authors:  J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal.

Authors:  C C Perkins; R G Seymann; D J Levis; R Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The abative effect: A new term to describe the action of antecedents that reduce operant responding.

Authors:  Sean Laraway; Susan Snycerski; Jack Michael; Alan Poling
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2002

2.  Effects of signaled and unsignaled shock on schedule-controlled lever pressing and schedule-induced licking: Shock intensity and body weight.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.