Literature DB >> 5501054

The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man.

C Blakemore.   

Abstract

1. Depth discrimination, using disparity cues alone, was studied with a small fixation point and briefly exposed, vertical slit-shaped targets.2. The upper limit for reliable qualitative localization of a slit as nearer or further than the fixation point is 4-7 deg of absolute disparity in a convergent direction and 9-12 deg in a divergent direction. Even larger absolute disparities can be recognized in the peripheral visual field.3. Relative depth discrimination between two slit targets was measured as a function of their spatial position. The horopter (the locus of targets that appear to be fused binocularly) is the region of maximum stereoacuity and this does not necessarily coincide with the Vieth-Müller circle (the locus of zero geometric or absolute disparity). There is a gradual increase in stereo-threshold as the targets are moved out along the horopter, away from the fixation point into the peripheral visual field. The relative disparity threshold also rises, approximately exponentially, as the targets are moved in depth or absolute disparity away from the horopter.4. Relative depth discrimination is, then, operative over a very wide band of visual space around the horopter (about 3 deg of absolute disparity in the centre of the visual field and even more in the periphery).5. The findings are discussed in relation to the neurophysiology of binocular neurones of the cat cortex. The dimensions of visual space under observation by the binocular apparatus of cat and man are rather similar. The sharper decline of stereo-acuity with absolute disparity in the centre of the visual field may be related to the limits of bilateral representation of a central strip of retina in the human brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5501054      PMCID: PMC1396079          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  15 in total

1.  Disparity limits of stereopsis.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1952-07

2.  Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Binocular depth perception and the corpus callosum.

Authors:  D E Mitchell; C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Binocular depth perception and the optic chiasm.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; T Nikara; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  T Nikara; P O Bishop; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images of dissimilar shape.

Authors:  D E Mitchell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision.

Authors:  D Fender; B Julesz
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-06

9.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination.

Authors:  H B Barlow; C Blakemore; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Retinal disparity and diplopia.

Authors:  D E Mitchell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  61 in total

1.  The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments.

Authors:  S J Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Peter J Bex; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Figure and ground in the visual cortex: v2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules.

Authors:  Fangtu T Qiu; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Vergence eye movements are not essential for stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Arthur J Lugtigheid; Laurie M Wilcox; Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex.

Authors:  Johannes Haushofer; Chris I Baker; Margaret S Livingstone; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Three-dimensional displays and stereo vision.

Authors:  Gerald Westheimer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.