Literature DB >> 5357250

Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division.

C Blakemore.   

Abstract

1. If classical partial decussation exactly segregates the projections of right and left hemi-retinae on to the two optic tracts, the images of an object in central vision, nearer or further than the fixation point, should project to separate hemispheres. This would prevent the encoding of retinal disparity by binocularly driven neurones of the visual cortex.2. It is proposed that there is a central vertical strip of retina in each eye which is represented in both hemispheres. The angular width of this strip should be exactly one half the actual range of horizontal disparities of binocular receptive fields near the central vertical meridian.3. By recording from single neurones in the area 17/18 region in both hemispheres of a cat, it was found that there is such a strip of bilateral projection. The centres of receptive fields for units from the two hemispheres overlap in the middle of the visual field by about 1.5 degrees and the S.D. of the distribution is about 0.5 degrees .4. The horizontal disparities of the centres of binocular receptive fields were measured for samples of units representing different parts of the visual field. The range of horizontal disparity for fields near the area centralis is about 2.3 degrees , the S.D. of the distribution about 0.9 degrees . The proposed relationship between bilateral projection and disparity coding is thus confirmed.5. The origin of the bilateral projection is a matter of speculation, but in the cat some of it is almost certainly due to imprecision in the nature of the nasotemporal division of optic nerve fibres at the optic chiasma. A case can be made, however, that the overlap is partly due to connexions through the corpus callosum between the two occipital lobes.6. Evidence for the importance of the callosal pathway in man is drawn from the effects on stereopsis of section of the chiasma and the callosum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1969        PMID: 5357250      PMCID: PMC1348615          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  19 in total

1.  The naso-temporal division of the cat's retina.

Authors:  J Stone
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat and monkey.

Authors:  M E Wilson; B G Cragg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Projection of the visual vertical meridian to cerebral cortex of the cat.

Authors:  J Leicester
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  T Nikara; P O Bishop; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Microelectrode analysis of transfer of visual information by the corpus callosum.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; M S Gazzaniga; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Distribution of corpus callosum and anterior commissure in cat and raccoon.

Authors:  F F Ebner; R E Myers
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Callosal connexions of the cortex representing the area centralis.

Authors:  C Vesbaesya; D Whitteridge; M E Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination.

Authors:  H B Barlow; C Blakemore; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  33 in total

1.  Binocular interaction in the cat's superior colliculus.

Authors:  N Berman; C Blakemore; M Cynader
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Crossed-uncrossed projections from primate retina are adapted to disparities of natural scenes.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Noah C Benson; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Local Integration Accounts for Weak Selectivity of Mouse Neocortical Parvalbumin Interneurons.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Jagruti J Pattadkal; Geoffrey A Dilly; Nicholas J Priebe; Boris V Zemelman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Binocular integration and disparity selectivity in mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Johannes Burge; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional organization of the cortical 17/18 border region in the cat.

Authors:  Y C Diao; W G Jia; N V Swindale; M S Cynader
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Callosal projections between areas 17 in the adult tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri).

Authors:  M Pritzel; R Kretz; G Rager
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binocular depth perception, visual acuity and visual fields in cats following neonatal section of the optic chiasm.

Authors:  B Timney; G Lansdown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The transfer of visual information across the corpus callosum: spatial and temporal properties in the cat.

Authors:  N Berardi; S Bisti; L Maffei
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Specificity of neuronal responses in primary visual cortex is modulated by interhemispheric corticocortical input.

Authors:  Kerstin E Schmidt; Stephen G Lomber; Giorgio M Innocenti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.