Literature DB >> 24352941

Vergence eye movements are not essential for stereoscopic depth.

Arthur J Lugtigheid1, Laurie M Wilcox, Robert S Allison, Ian P Howard.   

Abstract

The brain receives disparate retinal input owing to the separation of the eyes, yet we usually perceive a single fused world. This is because of complex interactions between sensory and oculomotor processes that quickly act to reduce excessive retinal disparity. This implies a strong link between depth perception and fusion, but it is well established that stereoscopic depth percepts are also obtained from stimuli that produce double images. Surprisingly, the nature of depth percepts from such diplopic stimuli remains poorly understood. Specifically, despite long-standing debate it is unclear whether depth under diplopia is owing to the retinal disparity (directly), or whether the brain interprets signals from fusional vergence responses to large disparities (indirectly). Here, we addressed this question using stereoscopic afterimages, for which fusional vergence cannot provide retinal feedback about depth. We showed that observers could reliably recover depth sign and magnitude from diplopic afterimages. In addition, measuring vergence responses to large disparity stimuli revealed that that the sign and magnitude of vergence responses are not systematically related to the target disparity, thus ruling out an indirect explanation of our results. Taken together, our research provides the first conclusive evidence that stereopsis is a direct process, even for diplopic targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diplopia; disparity; fusion; stereopsis; vergence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352941      PMCID: PMC3871307          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  Stereopsis, cyclovergence and the backwards tilt of the vertical horopter.

Authors:  J Siderov; R S Harwerth; H E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images.

Authors:  G WESTHEIMER; I J TANZMAN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1956-02

3.  Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1953-10

4.  Disparity limits of stereopsis.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1952-07

5.  Depth perception during diplopia is direct.

Authors:  L R Ziegler; R F Hess
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: temporalward and nasalward ranges.

Authors:  D B Diner; D H Fender
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Local versus global stereopsis: two mechanisms?

Authors:  W Richards; M G Kaye
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Dmax for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content.

Authors:  L M Wilcox; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution.

Authors:  C Schor; I Wood; J Ogawa
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Anomalies of disparity detection in the human visual system.

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Congenitally Impaired Disparity Vergence in Children With Infantile Esotropia.

Authors:  Krista R Kelly; Joost Felius; Santoshi Ramachandran; Blesson A John; Reed M Jost; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Correlations between clinical measures and symptoms: Report 1: Stereoacuity with accommodative, vergence measures, and symptoms.

Authors:  Samuel Otabor Wajuihian
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  The (In)Effectiveness of Simulated Blur for Depth Perception in Naturalistic Images.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.