Literature DB >> 22685339

Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Susan G Wardle1, Peter J Bex, John Cass, David Alais.   

Abstract

It is well-established that depth discrimination is finer in the fovea than the periphery. Here, we study the decline in depth discrimination thresholds with distance from the fovea using an equivalent noise analysis to separate the contributions of internal noise and sampling efficiency. Observers discriminated the mean depth of patches of "dead leaves" composed of ellipses varying in size, orientation, and luminance at varying levels of disparity noise between 0.05 and 13.56 arcmin and visual field locations between 0° and 9° eccentricity. At low levels of disparity noise, depth discrimination thresholds were lower in the fovea than in the periphery. At higher noise levels (above 3.39 arcmin), thresholds converged, and there was little difference between foveal and peripheral depth discrimination. The parameters estimated from the equivalent noise model indicate that an increase in internal noise is the limiting factor in peripheral depth discrimination with no decline in sampling efficiency. Sampling efficiency was uniformly low across the visual field. The results indicate that a loss of precision of local disparity estimates early in visual processing limits fine depth discrimination in the periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22685339      PMCID: PMC4502945          DOI: 10.1167/12.6.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  49 in total

1.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise.

Authors:  Z L Lu; B A Dosher
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Same calculation efficiency but different internal noise for luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli detection.

Authors:  Rémy Allard; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatial dependencies between local luminance and contrast in natural images.

Authors:  Jussi T Lindgren; Jarmo Hurri; Aapo Hyvärinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?

Authors:  G Westheimer; S P McKee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Binocular single vision and depth discrimination. Receptive field disparities for central and peripheral vision and binocular interaction on peripheral single units in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  D E Joshua; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; A P Aitsebaomo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity.

Authors:  M Fendick; G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye.

Authors:  J A Jennings; W N Charman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  11 in total

1.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Characterization of Spatial Frequency Channels Underlying Disparity Sensitivity by Factor Analysis of Population Data.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Dynamics of contrast adaptation in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Suzanne McKee; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Near-optimal combination of disparity across a log-polar scaled visual field.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Peter J Bex; Fabio Solari
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  The Effect of Induced Intraocular Stray Light on Recognition Thresholds for Pseudo-High-Pass Filtered Letters.

Authors:  Nilpa Shah; Steven C Dakin; Pádraig J Mulholland; Kalina Racheva; Juliane Matlach; Roger S Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Effect of depth information on multiple-object tracking in three dimensions: A probabilistic perspective.

Authors:  James R H Cooke; Arjan C Ter Horst; Robert J van Beers; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The equivalent internal orientation and position noise for contour integration.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Minnie Fu; Reza Farivar; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impairment of cyclopean surface processing by disparity-defined masking stimuli.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.