Literature DB >> 5450700

Auditory frequency-following response: neural or artifact?

J T Marsh, F G Worden, J C Smith.   

Abstract

An electrical response which reproduces the waveform and frequency of the sound stimulus can be recorded from the central neural pathway for audition. Controversy has existed for some years over whether this frequency-following response (FFR) is neural or an artifact such as remote pickup of the cochlear microphonic or cross talk in the recording system. Two experiments resolve this issue by demonstrating that the frequency-following response depends upon functionally intact neural pathways. The frequency-following response, as well as auditory evoked potentials, is abolished by section of the eighth nerve; it is reversibly abolished by cooling of the cochlear nucleus.

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5450700     DOI: 10.1126/science.169.3951.1222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  13 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  On the origin of the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Hermann Wagner; Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function.

Authors:  S Dhar; R Abel; J Hornickel; T Nicol; E Skoe; W Zhao; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Erika Skoe; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Richard Ashley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Precedence-effect-induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition in socially reared but not isolation-reared rats.

Authors:  Yi Du; Jingyu Li; Xihong Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  A high-density EEG investigation into steady state binaural beat stimulation.

Authors:  Peter Goodin; Joseph Ciorciari; Kate Baker; Anne-Marie Carey; Anne-Marie Carrey; Michelle Harper; Jordy Kaufman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Craig A Buchman; Benjamin P Wei; Margaret T Dillon; Shuman He; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2013-02-21

10.  Electrically-evoked frequency-following response (EFFR) in the auditory brainstem of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Wenxin He; Xiuyong Ding; Ruxiang Zhang; Jing Chen; Daoxing Zhang; Xihong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.