Literature DB >> 19824950

The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Bharath Chandrasekaran1, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the remarkable fidelity with which the human auditory brainstem represents key acoustic features of the speech signal. The brainstem response to speech can be assessed noninvasively by examining scalp-recorded evoked potentials. Morphologically, two main components of the scalp-recorded brainstem response can be differentiated, a transient onset response and a sustained frequency-following response (FFR). Together, these two components are capable of conveying important segmental and suprasegmental information inherent in the typical speech syllable. Here we examine the putative neural sources of the scalp-recorded brainstem response and review recent evidence that demonstrates that the brainstem response to speech is dynamic in nature and malleable by experience. Finally, we propose a putative mechanism for experience-dependent plasticity at the level of the brainstem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19824950      PMCID: PMC3088516          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00928.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  94 in total

1.  Age-related morphological changes in auditory middle-latency response.

Authors:  T Suzuki; M Hirabayashi
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1987

2.  Scalp-recorded frequency-following responses in neonates.

Authors:  J Gardi; A Salamy; T Mendelson
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec

3.  Specificity of combination-sensitive neurons for processing of complex biosonar signals in auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  N Suga; W E O'Neill; K Kujirai; T Manabe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Components of the frequency-following potential in man.

Authors:  R D Stillman; G Crow; G Moushegian
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

5.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phase-locked cortical responses to a human speech sound and low-frequency tones in the monkey.

Authors:  M Steinschneider; J Arezzo; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.

Authors:  J Gardi; M Merzenich; C McKean
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

8.  The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation.

Authors:  E M Glaser; C M Suter; R Dasheiff; A Goldberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01

9.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05

10.  Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells.

Authors:  A R Palmer; I J Russell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  165 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

6.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reduced Structural Connectivity Between Left Auditory Thalamus and the Motion-Sensitive Planum Temporale in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Nadja Tschentscher; Anja Ruisinger; Helen Blank; Begoña Díaz; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.