Literature DB >> 30950746

Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Zilong Xie1, Rachel Reetzke1, Bharath Chandrasekaran2.   

Abstract

Purpose Speech-evoked neurophysiological responses are often collected to answer clinically and theoretically driven questions concerning speech and language processing. Here, we highlight the practical application of machine learning (ML)-based approaches to analyzing speech-evoked neurophysiological responses. Method Two categories of ML-based approaches are introduced: decoding models, which generate a speech stimulus output using the features from the neurophysiological responses, and encoding models, which use speech stimulus features to predict neurophysiological responses. In this review, we focus on (a) a decoding model classification approach, wherein speech-evoked neurophysiological responses are classified as belonging to 1 of a finite set of possible speech events (e.g., phonological categories), and (b) an encoding model temporal response function approach, which quantifies the transformation of a speech stimulus feature to continuous neural activity. Results We illustrate the utility of the classification approach to analyze early electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to Mandarin lexical tone categories from a traditional experimental design, and to classify EEG responses to English phonemes evoked by natural continuous speech (i.e., an audiobook) into phonological categories (plosive, fricative, nasal, and vowel). We also demonstrate the utility of temporal response function to predict EEG responses to natural continuous speech from acoustic features. Neural metrics from the 3 examples all exhibit statistically significant effects at the individual level. Conclusion We propose that ML-based approaches can complement traditional analysis approaches to analyze neurophysiological responses to speech signals and provide a deeper understanding of natural speech and language processing using ecologically valid paradigms in both typical and clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30950746      PMCID: PMC6802895          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-ASTM-18-0244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  80 in total

1.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 2.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Colin Phillips; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Barbara Trommer; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07

Review 4.  Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Kelly L Tremblay; Peggy Korczak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Decoding the attended speech stream with multi-channel EEG: implications for online, daily-life applications.

Authors:  Bojana Mirkovic; Stefan Debener; Manuela Jaeger; Maarten De Vos
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Laboratory note. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range.

Authors:  G Moushegian; A L Rupert; R D Stillman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-12

8.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Atypical cortical entrainment to speech in the right hemisphere underpins phonemic deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; Varghese Peter; Marina Kalashnikova; Usha Goswami; Denis Burnham; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Encoding and Decoding Models in Cognitive Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christopher R Holdgraf; Jochem W Rieger; Cristiano Micheli; Stephanie Martin; Robert T Knight; Frederic E Theunissen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  Lifelong Tone Language Experience does not Eliminate Deficits in Neural Encoding of Pitch in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Joseph C Y Lau; Carol K S To; Judy S K Kwan; Xin Kang; Molly Losh; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-11-20

2.  Virtual reality and speech analysis for the assessment of impulsivity and decision-making: protocol for a comparison with neuropsychological tasks and self-administered questionnaires.

Authors:  Santiago de Leon-Martinez; Marta Ruiz; Elena Parra-Vargas; Irene Chicchi-Giglioli; Philippe Courtet; Jorge Lopez-Castroman; Antonio Artes; Enrique Baca-Garcia; Alejandro Albán Porras-Segovia; Maria Luisa Barrigon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  The emergence of idiosyncratic patterns in the frequency-following response during the first year of life.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; T Christina Zhao; Patricia K Kuhl; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; James S German; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.054

Review 6.  Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Trent Nicol; Travis White-Schwoch; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Robert J Zatorre; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Infants' neural speech discrimination predicts individual differences in grammar ability at 6 years of age and their risk of developing speech-language disorders.

Authors:  T Christina Zhao; Olivia Boorom; Patricia K Kuhl; Reyna Gordon
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.811

8.  Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Can Xu; Lisa Gold; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Neural-Behavioral Relation in Phonetic Discrimination Modulated by Language Background.

Authors:  Tian Christina Zhao
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.