Literature DB >> 521430

The simplest treatment alternative: the law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child.

B C Etzel, J M LeBlanc.   

Abstract

A method for choosing effective teaching procedures for difficult-to-teach children is proposed. Assessment of child responses during teaching that involves gradually increasing environmental support in the learning setting is the basis for choice. The levels of environmental support in which child responses are assessed are (1) trial-and-error procedures; (2) increased environmental support involving analyses of reinforcement systems, incompatible responses, and prerequisite skills, as well as the most effective use of instructional control; and (3) errorless-learning procedures. Effects of instructions upon learning are discussed in terms of instructional detail and pacing, as well as with respect to the role of instructions in feedback and progressively delayed cue procedures. Stimulus shaping and stimulus fading are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of each for teaching children who have difficulty learning with more traditional procedures. The importance of the incorporation of criterion-related cues when utilizing stimulus shaping or fading is emphasized. It is proposed that an assessment of child responses should be made with respect to the three general levels of environmental support, as well as from sublevels within these, in order to choose the simplest but still effective alternative procedure for teaching difficult-to-teach children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 521430     DOI: 10.1007/BF01531445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord        ISSN: 0162-3257


  13 in total

1.  Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum.

Authors:  D H LAWRENCE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1952-12

3.  An implicit technology of generalization.

Authors:  T F Stokes; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

4.  Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.

Authors:  L Schreibman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

5.  The efficacy of stimulus fading and contingency management in the treatment of elective mutism: a case study.

Authors:  M Wulbert; B A Nyman; D Snow; Y Owen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

6.  Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children.

Authors:  R L Koegel; A Rincover
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976

7.  Fading procedures and conditional discrimination in children.

Authors:  E S Gollin; P Savoy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys.

Authors:  P E Touchette
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Variables affecting stimulus fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children.

Authors:  A Rincover
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1978-10

10.  Conditional discrimination after errorless and trial-and-error training.

Authors:  G L Schilmoeller; K J Schilmoeller; B C Etzel; J M LeBlanc
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Functions of the environment in behavioral evolution.

Authors:  S S Glenn; D P Field
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

2.  Stimulus control terminology.

Authors:  S M Dietz; L W Malone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1985

3.  Transfer of discriminative control during stimulus fading conducted without reinforcement.

Authors:  Lanny Fields
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Discrimination training for persons with developmental disabilities: a comparison of the task demonstration model and the standard prompting hierarchy.

Authors:  A C Repp; K G Karsh; M W Lenz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

5.  An Evaluation of Positional Prompts for Teaching Receptive Identification to Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Justin B Leaf; Joseph H Cihon; Donna Townley-Cochran; Kevin Miller; Ronald Leaf; John McEachin; Mitchell Taubman
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Comparison of Prompting Hierarchies on the Acquisition of Leisure and Vocational Skills.

Authors:  Julie A McKay; Julie S Weiss; Chata A Dickson; William H Ahearn
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2014-09-04

7.  A comparison of procedures in teaching self-help skills: increasing assistance, time delay, and observational learning.

Authors:  S F Schoen; E O Sivil
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1989-03

8.  Some Things We Learned from Sidman and Some We Did Not (We Think).

Authors:  William J McIlvane; Joanne B Kledaras
Journal:  Eur J Behav Anal       Date:  2012

9.  Assessing Nonverbal Same/Different Judgments of Auditory Stimuli in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Methodological Investigation.

Authors:  Richard W Serna; Mark A Preston; G Brooks Thompson
Journal:  Rev Bras Anal Comport       Date:  2009

10.  Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children.

Authors:  M D Mosk; B Bucher
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.