Literature DB >> 6725167

Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children.

M D Mosk, B Bucher.   

Abstract

Stimulus shaping appears to be a highly successful way to teach discrimination skills. In stimulus shaping, the topographical configuration of the stimuli is gradually changed over trials so that discrimination is at first easy, and then gradually more difficult. Stimulus shaping procedures might also be effective for training visual-motor tasks. Two experiments were conducted to assess the relative effectiveness of stimulus shaping and "traditional" prompting procedures. Pegboard skills were trained in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2 a self-care skill was trained, in which children learned to hang a toothbrush or a washcloth on a specific hook. Six low-functioning retarded children were studied in each experiment, using a within-subject alternating treatments design. Each participant received concurrent training on two related tasks, using stimulus shaping for one and a standard prompting procedure for the other. Training with the stimulus shaping procedure required less training time to criterion, always resulted in fewer errors, always required fewer and less intrusive therapist's prompts, and always resulted in greater density of reinforcement. These results demonstrate the value of stimulus shaping strategies for training visual-motor skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725167      PMCID: PMC1307915          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  19 in total

1.  Effects of distinctive-feature training and instructional technique on letter and form discrimination.

Authors:  M J Guralnick
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1975-09

2.  Task analysis of a complex assembly task by the retarded blind.

Authors:  M W Gold
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  1976-10

3.  Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children.

Authors:  R L Koegel; A Rincover
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1976

4.  The development of quality, quantity and durability in the work performance of retarded students in a public school prevocational workshop.

Authors:  L Brown; T Bellamy; L Perlmutter; P Sackowitz; E Sontag
Journal:  Train Sch Bull (Vinel)       Date:  1972-08

5.  Variables affecting stimulus fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children.

Authors:  A Rincover
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1978-10

6.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.

Authors:  D H Barlow; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

7.  The simplest treatment alternative: the law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child.

Authors:  B C Etzel; J M LeBlanc
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1979-12

8.  Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting of letter discrimination by mentally retarded persons.

Authors:  V F Wolfe; A J Cuvo
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1978-11

9.  Teaching janitorial skills to the mentally retarded: acquisition, generalization, and maintenance.

Authors:  A J Cuvo; R B Leaf; L S Borakove
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

10.  Conditional discrimination after errorless and trial-and-error training.

Authors:  G L Schilmoeller; K J Schilmoeller; B C Etzel; J M LeBlanc
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Strategic and tactical limits of comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Johnston
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

2.  Stimulus control terminology.

Authors:  S M Dietz; L W Malone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1985

3.  Discrimination training for persons with developmental disabilities: a comparison of the task demonstration model and the standard prompting hierarchy.

Authors:  A C Repp; K G Karsh; M W Lenz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

4.  Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of two stimulus prompt strategies with severely handicapped students.

Authors:  M W Steege; D P Wacker; C M McMahon
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1987
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.