Literature DB >> 25815688

Effects of hearing and aging on sentence-level time-gated word recognition.

Michelle R Molis, Sean D Kampel, Garnett P McMillan, Frederick J Gallun, Serena M Dann, Dawn Konrad-Martin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aging is known to influence temporal processing, but its relationship to speech perception has not been clearly defined. To examine listeners' use of contextual and phonetic information, the Revised Speech Perception in Noise test (R-SPIN) was used to develop a time-gated word (TGW) task.
METHOD: In Experiment 1, R-SPIN sentence lists were matched on context, target-word length, and median word segment length necessary for target recognition. In Experiment 2, TGW recognition was assessed in quiet and in noise among adults of various ages with normal hearing to moderate hearing loss. Linear regression models of the minimum word duration necessary for correct identification and identification failure rates were developed. Age and hearing thresholds were modeled as continuous predictors with corrections for correlations among multiple measurements of the same participants.
RESULTS: While aging and hearing loss both had significant impacts on task performance in the most adverse listening condition (low context, in noise), for most conditions, performance was limited primarily by hearing loss.
CONCLUSION: Whereas hearing loss was strongly related to target-word recognition, the effect of aging was only weakly related to task performance. These results have implications for the design and evaluation of studies of hearing and aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25815688      PMCID: PMC4635971          DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  32 in total

1.  Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  J R Dubno; J B Ahlstrom; A R Horwitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related changes in temporal resolution: envelope and intensity effects.

Authors:  B Schneider; F Speranza; M K Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1998-12

3.  Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pickora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; K E Evan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

9.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Gated auditory speech perception: effects of listening conditions and cognitive capacity.

Authors:  Shahram Moradi; Björn Lidestam; Amin Saremi; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Eriko Atagi; Ying-Yee Kong; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Molly Norris; George Spanos; Katherine Radasevich; Paige Formsma; Brian Gygi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-Hearing Individuals: Effects of Adding Visual Cues to Auditory Speech Stimuli.

Authors:  Shahram Moradi; Björn Lidestam; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.