PURPOSE: The perceptual consequences of rate reduction, increased vocal intensity, and clear speech were studied in speakers with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and healthy controls. METHOD: Seventy-eight speakers read sentences in habitual, clear, loud, and slow conditions. Sentences were equated for peak amplitude and mixed with multitalker babble for presentation to listeners. Using a computerized visual analog scale, listeners judged intelligibility or speech severity as operationally defined in Sussman and Tjaden (2012). RESULTS: Loud and clear but not slow conditions improved intelligibility relative to the habitual condition. With the exception of the loud condition for the PD group, speech severity did not improve above habitual and was reduced relative to habitual in some instances. Intelligibility and speech severity were strongly related, but relationships for disordered speakers were weaker in clear and slow conditions versus habitual. CONCLUSIONS: Both clear and loud speech show promise for improving intelligibility and maintaining or improving speech severity in multitalker babble for speakers with mild dysarthria secondary to MS or PD, at least as these perceptual constructs were defined and measured in this study. Although scaled intelligibility and speech severity overlap, the metrics further appear to have some separate value in documenting treatment-related speech changes.
PURPOSE: The perceptual consequences of rate reduction, increased vocal intensity, and clear speech were studied in speakers with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and healthy controls. METHOD: Seventy-eight speakers read sentences in habitual, clear, loud, and slow conditions. Sentences were equated for peak amplitude and mixed with multitalker babble for presentation to listeners. Using a computerized visual analog scale, listeners judged intelligibility or speech severity as operationally defined in Sussman and Tjaden (2012). RESULTS: Loud and clear but not slow conditions improved intelligibility relative to the habitual condition. With the exception of the loud condition for the PD group, speech severity did not improve above habitual and was reduced relative to habitual in some instances. Intelligibility and speech severity were strongly related, but relationships for disordered speakers were weaker in clear and slow conditions versus habitual. CONCLUSIONS: Both clear and loud speech show promise for improving intelligibility and maintaining or improving speech severity in multitalker babble for speakers with mild dysarthria secondary to MS or PD, at least as these perceptual constructs were defined and measured in this study. Although scaled intelligibility and speech severity overlap, the metrics further appear to have some separate value in documenting treatment-related speech changes.
Authors: Michael P Cannito; Debra M Suiter; Doriann Beverly; Lesya Chorna; Teresa Wolf; Ronald M Pfeiffer Journal: J Voice Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Deborah Matheron; Elaine T Stathopoulos; Jessica E Huber; Joan E Sussman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Tanya L Eadie; Devon Sawin Otero; Susan Bolt; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Jessica R Sullivan Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Adam P Vogel; Lisa H Stoll; Andreas Oettinger; Natalie Rommel; Eva-Maria Kraus; Dagmar Timmann; Dion Scott; Christina Atay; Elsdon Storey; Ludger Schöls; Matthis Synofzik Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.849