Literature DB >> 16811740

The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction.

P A De Villiers.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the quantitative relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in single and multiple variable-interval avoidance schedules. Responses cancelled delivery of shocks that were scheduled by variable-interval schedules. When shock-frequency reduction was taken as the measure of reinforcement, the relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency on single variable-interval avoidance schedules was accurately described by Herrnstein's (1970) equation for responding on single variable-interval schedules of positive reinforcement. On multiple variable-interval avoidance schedules with brief components, asymptotic relative response rate matched relative shock-frequency reduction. The results suggest that many interactions between response rates and shock-frequency reduction in avoidance can be understood within the framework of the generalized matching relation, as applied by Herrnstein (1970) to positive reinforcement.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811740      PMCID: PMC1333190          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement and response rate interaction in multiple random-interval avoidance schedules.

Authors:  P A De Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Method and theory in the study of avoidance.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Pigeon Lab notable experience.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Context matters: my education at the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Terry W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab in context.

Authors:  Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab, 1970-1998: graduate students and matching law research.

Authors:  Gene M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conjoint schedules of timeout deletion in pigeons.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching in concurrent variable-interval avoidance schedules.

Authors:  A W Logue; P A De Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Chained schedules of avoidance: Reinforcement within and by avoidance situations.

Authors:  R J Dewaard; M Galizio; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching with a key-peck response in concurrent negative reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  L Hutton; E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.