Literature DB >> 4789399

Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy.

R W Griffiths, P R Kunz.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1973        PMID： 4789399     DOI： 10.1080/19485565.1973.9988075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Biol        ISSN： 0037-766X


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates.

Authors:  Johanna Lass-Hennemann; Christian E Deuter; Linn K Kuehl; André Schulz; Terry D Blumenthal; Hartmut Schachinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; L Morris Gosling; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett; Vaughan Carter; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Discriminating males and unpredictable females: males differentiate self-similar facial cues more than females in the judgment of opposite-sex attractiveness.

Authors:  Jin-Ying Zhuang; Sen Zhang; Jing Xu; Die Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Partnership Status on Preferences for Facial Self-Resemblance.

Authors:  Jitka Lindová; Anthony C Little; Jan Havlíček; S Craig Roberts; Anna Rubešová; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-14

9.  Revisiting facial resemblance in couples.

Authors:  Yetta Kwailing Wong; Wing Wah Wong; Kelvin F H Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spouses' faces are similar but do not become more similar with time.

Authors:  Pin Pin Tea-Makorn; Michal Kosinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.