Literature DB >> 17148217

MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.

S Craig Roberts1, Anthony C Little, L Morris Gosling, Benedict C Jones, David I Perrett, Vaughan Carter, Marion Petrie.   

Abstract

Individuals tend to choose mates who are sufficiently genetically dissimilar to avoid inbreeding. As facial attractiveness is a key factor in human mate preference, we investigated whether facial preferences were related to genetic dissimilarity. We asked female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of men from photographs and compared these results with individual genotypes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In contrast to previously reported preferences based on odour, we found a non-significant tendency for women to rate MHC-similar faces as more attractive, suggesting a preference for cues to a self-similar MHC in faces. Further analysis revealed that male faces received higher attractiveness scores when rated by women who were MHC-similar than by MHC-dissimilar women. Although unexpected, this MHC-similar facial preference is consistent with other studies documenting assortative preferences in humans, including for facial phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148217      PMCID: PMC1626373          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  28 in total

1.  Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; L Morris Gosling
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-24       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy.

Authors:  R W Griffiths; P R Kunz
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1973-12

3.  Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics.

Authors:  J N Spuhler
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1968-06

4.  Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding.

Authors:  P Bateson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlicek; Jaroslav Flegr; Martina Hruskova; Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Analysis of the frequencies of HLA-A, B, and C alleles and haplotypes in the five major ethnic groups of the United States reveals high levels of diversity in these loci and contrasting distribution patterns in these populations.

Authors:  K Cao; J Hollenbach; X Shi; W Shi; M Chopek; M A Fernández-Viña
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.850

7.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans.

Authors:  Bogusław Pawłowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.

Authors:  Tamas Bereczkei; Petra Gyuris; Glenn E Weisfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  17 in total

1.  Human homogamy in facial characteristics: does a sexual-imprinting-like mechanism play a role?

Authors:  Saori Nojo; Satoshi Tamura; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-09

2.  Odour signals major histocompatibility complex genotype in an Old World monkey.

Authors:  Joanna M Setchell; Stefano Vaglio; Kristin M Abbott; Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi; Francesca Boscaro; Giuseppe Pieraccini; Leslie A Knapp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Self/nonself perception, reproduction and the extended MHC.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Thomas Kellermann; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler
Journal:  Self Nonself       Date:  2010-06-21

4.  Eco-immunology of fish invasions: the role of MHC variation.

Authors:  C Monzón-Argüello; C Garcia de Leaniz; G Gajardo; S Consuegra
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  Absence of evidence for MHC-dependent mate selection within HapMap populations.

Authors:  Adnan Derti; Can Cenik; Peter Kraft; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.

Authors:  Tamas Bereczkei; Gabor Hegedus; Gabor Hajnal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Evidence for genetic variation in human mate preferences for sexually dimorphic physical traits.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Andrea V Burri; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic variation in the odorant receptors family 13 and the mhc loci influence mate selection in a multiple sclerosis dataset.

Authors:  Pouya Khankhanian; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Stacy J Caillier; Adam Santaniello; Stephen L Hauser; Sergio E Baranzini; Jorge R Oksenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  The scent of attraction and the smell of success: crossmodal influences on person perception.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.