Literature DB >> 18327646

Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

S Craig Roberts1, Anthony C Little.   

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a rapidly growing interest in the biological basis of human mate choice. Here we review recent studies that demonstrate preferences for traits which might reveal genetic quality to prospective mates, with potential but still largely unknown influence on offspring fitness. These include studies assessing visual, olfactory and auditory preferences for potential good-gene indicator traits, such as dominance or bilateral symmetry. Individual differences in these robust preferences mainly arise through within and between individual variation in condition and reproductive status. Another set of studies have revealed preferences for traits indicating complementary genes, focussing on discrimination of dissimilarity at genes in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). As in animal studies, we are only just beginning to understand how preferences for specific traits vary and inter-relate, how consideration of good and compatible genes can lead to substantial variability in individual mate choice decisions and how preferences expressed in one sensory modality may reflect those in another. Humans may be an ideal model species in which to explore these interesting complexities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327646     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9254-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  92 in total

1.  Characteristics of male attractiveness for women.

Authors:  D S Maisey; E L Vale; P L Cornelissen; M J Tovée
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  MHC and mate selection in humans?

Authors:  P Hedrick; V Loeschcke
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students.

Authors:  Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Juliano Augusto Schinemann; Juarez Gabardo; Maria da Graça Bicalho
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlicek; Jaroslav Flegr; Martina Hruskova; Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.

Authors:  B C Jones; A C Little; L Boothroyd; L M Debruine; D R Feinberg; M J Law Smith; R E Cornwell; F R Moore; D I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Correlations between heterozygosity and measures of genetic similarity: implications for understanding mate choice.

Authors:  S C Roberts; M L Hale; M Petrie
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Facial resemblance enhances trust.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

10.  Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote superiority during coinfection.

Authors:  Erin E McClelland; Dustin J Penn; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  11 in total

1.  A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Timo Thünken; Denis Meuthen; Theo C M Bakker; Sebastian A Baldauf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Gabriela Gleiser; Sara Teixeira; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Christopher D Watkins; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Finlay G Smith; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Femme/Butch/Androgyne Identity and Preferences for Femininity Across Face, Voice, and Personality Traits in Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women.

Authors:  Jing Zhang
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-26

5.  What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.

Authors:  Rafael Wlodarski; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Menstrual cycle effects on attitudes toward romantic kissing.

Authors:  Rafael Wlodarski; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

7.  Genetic variation in the odorant receptors family 13 and the mhc loci influence mate selection in a multiple sclerosis dataset.

Authors:  Pouya Khankhanian; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Stacy J Caillier; Adam Santaniello; Stephen L Hauser; Sergio E Baranzini; Jorge R Oksenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Selflessness is sexy: reported helping behaviour increases desirability of men and women as long-term sexual partners.

Authors:  David Moore; Stuart Wigby; Sinead English; Sonny Wong; Tamás Székely; Freya Harrison
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Simulating the evolution of the human family: cooperative breeding increases in harsh environments.

Authors:  Paul E Smaldino; Lesley Newson; Jeffrey C Schank; Peter J Richerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of Partnership Status on Preferences for Facial Self-Resemblance.

Authors:  Jitka Lindová; Anthony C Little; Jan Havlíček; S Craig Roberts; Anna Rubešová; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.