Literature DB >> 4752089

Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.

D D Foree, F H Moretz, D E McMillan.   

Abstract

The effects of d-amphetamine on punished responding were studied in two experiments. In Experiment I, pigeons responded under a multiple fixed-ratio 30 response fixed-interval 5-min schedule of food presentation with 60-sec limited holds in both components. Each response was punished with electric shock, the intensity of which was varied systematically. In Experiment II, another group of pigeons responded under a multiple fixed-interval 5-min fixed-interval 5-min schedule of food presentation with 40-sec limited holds. Each response was punished with shock during one component, and every thirtieth response was punished in the other component. d-Amphetamine increased overall rates of punished responding only rarely under any of the punishment conditions; however, response rates within the fixed-interval when rates were low were increased by d-amphetamine when the shock intensity was low (Experiment I), or when responses produced shock intermittently (Experiment II). The data suggest that the effects of d-amphetamine on punished responding depend on the control rate of responding, the punishment intensity, the punishment frequency, and the schedule of food presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4752089      PMCID: PMC1334129          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  FIXED-RATIO PUNISHMENT WITH CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  D P HENDRY; C VANTOLLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE UPON OPERANT BEHAVIOR OF PIGEONS: ENHANCEMENT BY RESERPINE.

Authors:  C B SMITH
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Analysis of effects of psychopharmacological agents in behavioral terms.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1958-12

Review 5.  Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  Ergeb Physiol       Date:  1968

6.  Drug effects in squirrel monkeys trained on a multiple schedule with a punishment contingency.

Authors:  H M Hanson; J J Witoslawski; E H Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effects of nicotine on punished behaviour.

Authors:  C F Morrison
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

8.  The effects of sympathomimetic amines on schedule-controlled behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under several parameters of multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Effects of D-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat.

Authors:  F C Clark; B J Steele
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966
View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of d-amphetamine on the temporal control of operant responding in rats during a preshock stimulus.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Amphetamine does not affect the partial punishment effect (PPE).

Authors:  I Weiner; H Bercovitz; J Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of d-amphetamine on responding simultaneously maintained and punished by presentation of electric shock.

Authors:  J E Barrett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Drugs and punished responding. 3. Punishment intensity as a determinant of drug effect.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973

5.  Differential effects of pentobarbital and cocaine on punished and nonpunished responding.

Authors:  S I Dworkin; C Bimle; T Miyauchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Punished behavior: increases in responding after d-amphetamine.

Authors:  J W McKearney; J E Barrett
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975

7.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide, morphine and amphetamine on responding suppressed by different levels of electric shock in the pigeon are rate dependent.

Authors:  J L Evenden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Interactions between narcotic agonists, partial agonists andd antagonists evaluated by punished an unpunished behavior in the rat.

Authors:  D Snell; R A Harris
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Comparison of the conditioned reinforcing properties of a safety signal and appetitive stimulus: effects of d-amphetamine and anxiolytics.

Authors:  A B P Fernando; G P Urcelay; A C Mar; A Dickinson; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.