Literature DB >> 3080770

Amphetamine does not affect the partial punishment effect (PPE).

I Weiner, H Bercovitz, J Feldon.   

Abstract

The effects of amphetamine on the partial punishment effect (PPE) at one trial per day, were examined. Two groups of animals were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received food reward on every trial. The partially punished (PP) group received food reward on every trial but in addition, received footshocks of a gradually increasing intensity in the goal box on a random 50% of the trials. In the test stage, all animals received both food and footshock on each trial. dl-Amphetamine 1.5 mg/kg was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e. drug-no drug in training and drug-no drug in test. The partially punished animals exhibited increased persitence in running to the goal box during test, and this "partial punishment effect" was unaffected by amphetamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3080770     DOI: 10.1007/bf00310526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Effects of scopolamine and d-amphetamine on locomotor activity before and after shock: a diallel analysis in mice.

Authors:  H Anisman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Chlordiazepoxide and resistance to punishment.

Authors:  N M Davis; S Brookes; J A Gray; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1981-11

4.  Stimulus control and the effects of d-amphetamine in the rat.

Authors:  V G Laties; R W Wood; D C Rees
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of successive bilateral hippocampectomy on DRL 20 performance in rats.

Authors:  S D Curtis; A J Nonneman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1977-12

6.  Drugs and punished responding. V. Effects of drugs on responding suppressed by response-dependent and response-independent electric shock.

Authors:  D E McMillan; J D Leander
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1975-01

7.  Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation.

Authors:  P R Solomon; J W Moore
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-12

8.  Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.

Authors:  D D Foree; F H Moretz; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Hippocampal lesions do not alter the partial punishment effect.

Authors:  S Brookes; J N Rawlins; J A Gray
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The partial reinforcement extinction effect: influence of chlordiazepoxide in septal lesioned rats.

Authors:  J Feldon; J A Gray
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification, quantification and bioinformatic analysis of RNA-dependent proteins by RNase treatment and density gradient ultracentrifugation using R-DeeP.

Authors:  Maiwen Caudron-Herger; Elsa Wassmer; Isha Nasa; Astrid-Solveig Schultz; Jeanette Seiler; Arminja N Kettenbach; Sven Diederichs
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 13.491

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.