Literature DB >> 1796131

Effects of chlordiazepoxide, morphine and amphetamine on responding suppressed by different levels of electric shock in the pigeon are rate dependent.

J L Evenden1.   

Abstract

In general, chlordiazepoxide (CDP) and amphetamine reduce high rates of responding and increase low rates (rate-dependent effect). However, unlike CDP, amphetamine does not typically increase low rates resulting from suppression of responding by noxious stimuli. In the present experiment, key pecking by pigeons was reinforced under a random ratio schedule of food presentation. This responding was then suppressed by stimuli correlated with electric shocks of varying intensity (2 or 4 mA) or reduced by the omission of the food (extinction). Treatment with CDP (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) increased the rate of suppressed responding: lower rates being increased to a proportionately greater extent than high rates. d-Amphetamine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) further reduced the rate of suppressed responding: the lower rates being reduced proportionately more than the higher rates. Thus the effects of all three drugs depended upon the control rates of responding, but the effects of amphetamine were the inverse of those of CDP, and morphine. The effects of amphetamine on low, suppressed or punished response rates are therefore not an exception to the generality of rate-dependency, but a different aspect of the same principle - "inverse rate-dependency".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1796131     DOI: 10.1007/BF02244318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparison of drug effects on responding punished by pressurized air or electric shock delivery in squirrel monkeys: pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, d-amphetamine and cocaine.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON AVOIDANCE AND ESCAPE BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  L COOK; A C CATANIA
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1964 Jul-Aug

4.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on responding suppressed by conditioned punishment.

Authors:  J O Valentine; J E Barrett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conflict behavior in the squirrel monkey: effects of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and N-desmethyldiazepam.

Authors:  J Sepinwall; F S Grodsky; L Cook
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Drugs and punished responding. 3. Punishment intensity as a determinant of drug effect.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973

8.  Effects of some benzodiazepines on punished and unpunished behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W Wuttke; R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effects of pentobarbital on punished behavior at different shock intensities.

Authors:  J M Witkin; J E Barrett
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.

Authors:  D D Foree; F H Moretz; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  The psychopharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VIII: effects of amphetamine, methylphenidate, and other drugs on responding maintained by a fixed consecutive number avoidance schedule.

Authors:  John Evenden; Tracey Ko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 4.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.