Literature DB >> 4965957

Drug effects in squirrel monkeys trained on a multiple schedule with a punishment contingency.

H M Hanson, J J Witoslawski, E H Campbell.   

Abstract

The behavior of four monkeys trained on a multiple schedule was differentially sensitive to selected pharmacological agents. The three components of the multiple schedule were: (1) a variable-interval schedule in which responses were reinforced on the average of once per minute; (2) a concurrent schedule in which every tenth response was reinforced and every fifteenth response, on the average, was shocked; and, (3) a neutral stimulus in the presence of which responses were neither reinforced nor shocked. Pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, and meprobamate increased responding during each of the components. Scopolamine and d-amphetamine decreased variable-interval performance, had minimal effects on performance during the concurrent-schedule component, and increased responding in the presence of the neutral stimulus. Chlorpromazine decreased variable-interval responding and had slight effects on the responding during the other two components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1967        PMID: 4965957      PMCID: PMC1338430          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  RELATIVE POTENCIES OF BENZODIAZEPINES AS MEASURED BY THEIR EFFECTS ON CONFLICT BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  I GELLER
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1964-05-01

2.  CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION IN RATS AND THE EFFECT OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS THEREON.

Authors:  H LAUENER
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1963-07-02

3.  THE EFFECTS OF SOME CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS ON CONFLICT BEHAVIOR IN DOGS.

Authors:  M TAMURA
Journal:  Jpn J Pharmacol       Date:  1963-08

4.  TRANQUILIZER EFFECTS ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION.

Authors:  O S RAY
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1964-01-07

5.  The effects of certain psychotropic agents on the conditioned emotional response behavior pattern of the albino rat.

Authors:  W J KINNARD; M D ACETO; J P BUCKLEY
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1962

6.  A comparative approach to the evaluation of drug effects upon affective behavior.

Authors:  J V BRADY
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1956-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Assessment of drug effects on emotional behavior.

Authors:  J V BRADY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effect of amobarbital and chlorpromazine on punished behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H Morse
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1964-10-14

9.  The effects of mono-urethans, di-urethans and barbiturates on a punishment discrimination.

Authors:  I GELLER; J SEIFTER
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.030

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  The effects of d-amphetamine on the temporal control of operant responding in rats during a preshock stimulus.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A choice technique to assess the effects of selective punishment on fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of chronically administered d-amphetamine on spaced responding maintained under multiple and single-component schedules.

Authors:  J B Smith
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of d-amphetamine on responding simultaneously maintained and punished by presentation of electric shock.

Authors:  J E Barrett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Dissociation of the anti-punishment activities of chlordiazepoxide and atropine using two heterogeneous passive avoidance tasks.

Authors:  J L Waddington; J E Olley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-03-23       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of operant history.

Authors:  C Urbain; A Poling; J Millam; T Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding.

Authors:  D D Foree; F H Moretz; D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Punished behavior: increases in responding after d-amphetamine.

Authors:  J W McKearney; J E Barrett
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975

10.  Changes in the rate-increasing effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital by response consequences.

Authors:  J B Smith; J W McKearney
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.