Literature DB >> 445371

Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey.

R R Rickert, O Auerbach, L Garfinkel, E C Hammond, J M Frasca.   

Abstract

A comprehensive autopsy survey of the large bowel showed that adenomas were very common lesions occurring in about one-half of the 518 cases studied. The great majority were small adenomatous polyps (tubular adenomas), 86.7% measuring less than 10 mm in diameter. Adenomas with a more complex tubulovillous pattern were larger with a mean diameter of 19.0 mm. There was no apparent incresae in mean size of adenomas with age. Nineteen clinically unsuspected cancers were discovered. Fourteen (8 in situ and 6 invasive) cancers had areas of residual benign adenoma. Five invasive cancers had no residual benign component. No in situ carcinomas or small (less than 10 mm) invasive cancers not containing residual adenoma were found. The results suggest that, although adenomas of the large bowel are very common, the vast majority are simple adenomatous polyps which do not undergo progressive growth and malignant change. Conversely, it appears that cancers may arise from benign adenomas which have the characteristics of large size and a more complex villous architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 445371     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197905)43:5<1847::aid-cncr2820430538>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  76 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  How should individuals with a false-positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer be managed? A decision analysis.

Authors:  Ulrike Haug; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk men.

Authors:  P G Foutch; H Mai; K Pardy; J A DiSario; R K Manne; D Kerr
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  A hierarchical non-homogenous Poisson model for meta-analysis of adenoma counts.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Onchee Yu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Adenoma screening and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Pollock; P Quirke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-07-06

7.  [Preneoplasias of the large intestine].

Authors:  F P Gall
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1985

8.  Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; J Dik F Habbema; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Joel V Brill; Zachary Levin; Kate M Bundorf
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.