Literature DB >> 22307927

How should individuals with a false-positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer be managed? A decision analysis.

Ulrike Haug1, Amy B Knudsen, Karen M Kuntz.   

Abstract

Several industrialized nations recommend fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC), but corresponding screening guidelines do not specify how individuals with a prior false-positive FOBT result (fpFOBT) should be managed in terms of subsequent CRC screening. Accordingly, we conducted a decision analysis to compare different strategies for managing such individuals. We used a previously developed CRC microsimulation model, SimCRC, to calculate life-years and the lifetime number of colonoscopies (as a measure of required resources) for a cohort of 50-year-olds to whom FOBT-based CRC screening is offered annually from 50 to 75 years. We compared three management strategies for individuals with a prior fpFOBT: (i) resume screening in 10 years with 10-yearly colonoscopy (SwitchCol_long); (ii) resume screening in 1 year with annual FOBT (ContinueFOBT_Short) and (iii) resume screening in 10 years (i.e., the recommended interval following a negative colonoscopy) with annual FOBT (ContinueFOBT_long). We performed sensitivity analyses on various parameters and assumptions. When using different management strategies for individuals with a prior fpFOBT, the variation in the number of life-years gained relative to no screening was <2%, whereas the variation in the lifetime number of colonoscopies was 23% (percentages are calculated as the maximum difference across strategies divided by the lowest number across strategies). The ContinueFOBT_long strategy showed the lowest lifetime number of colonoscopies per life-year gained even when key assumptions were varied. In conclusion, the ContinueFOBT_long strategy was advantageous regarding both clinical benefit and required resources. Specifying an appropriate management strategy for individuals with a prior fpFOBT may substantially reduce required resources within a FOBT-based CRC screening program without limiting its effectiveness.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22307927      PMCID: PMC3693764          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  36 in total

1.  Relationship between the fecal occult blood test and benign anal disorders.

Authors:  K Sasaki; M Kunimoto; K Hirata
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Barry E Storer; Libby M Morimoto; Allyson Templeton; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Polyps of the colon in Barcelona, Spain. An autopsy study.

Authors:  J A Bombi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer.

Authors:  J C Clark; Y Collan; T J Eide; J Estève; S Ewen; N M Gibbs; O M Jensen; E Koskela; R MacLennan; J G Simpson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study.

Authors:  J F Johanson; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool.

Authors:  A R Williams; B A Balasooriya; D W Day
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey.

Authors:  R R Rickert; O Auerbach; L Garfinkel; E C Hammond; J M Frasca
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study.

Authors:  M H Vatn; H Stalsberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Polyps of the large intestine in Aarhus, Denmark. An autopsy study.

Authors:  L G Johannsen; O Momsen; N O Jacobsen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term Follow-up of Patients Having False-Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests after Negative Screening Colonoscopy: The LONG-HAUL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Thomas G Cotter; Kelli N Burger; Mary E Devens; Julie A Simonson; Kari L Lowrie; Russell I Heigh; Douglas W Mahoney; David H Johnson; David A Ahlquist; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Are Hemorrhoids Associated with False-Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results?

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.