Literature DB >> 20664028

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Amy B Knudsen1, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Carolyn M Rutter, James E Savarino, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Karen M Kuntz, Ann G Zauber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considered whether to reimburse computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer screening of Medicare enrollees. To help inform its decision, we evaluated the reimbursement rate at which CTC screening could be cost-effective compared with the colorectal cancer screening tests that are currently reimbursed by CMS and are included in most colorectal cancer screening guidelines, namely annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years in conjunction with annual FOBT, and colonoscopy every 10 years.
METHODS: We used three independently developed microsimulation models to assess the health outcomes and costs associated with CTC screening and with currently reimbursed colorectal cancer screening tests among the average-risk Medicare population. We assumed that CTC was performed every 5 years (using test characteristics from either a Department of Defense CTC study or the National CTC Trial) and that individuals with findings of 6 mm or larger were referred to colonoscopy. We computed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the currently reimbursed screening tests and calculated the maximum cost per scan (ie, the threshold cost) for the CTC strategy to lie on the efficient frontier. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key parameters and assumptions.
RESULTS: Assuming perfect adherence with all tests, the undiscounted number life-years gained from CTC screening ranged from 143 to 178 per 1000 65-year-olds, which was slightly less than the number of life-years gained from 10-yearly colonoscopy (152-185 per 1000 65-year-olds) and comparable to that from 5-yearly sigmoidoscopy with annual FOBT (149-177 per 1000 65-year-olds). If CTC screening was reimbursed at $488 per scan (slightly less than the reimbursement for a colonoscopy without polypectomy), it would be the most costly strategy. CTC screening could be cost-effective at $108-$205 per scan, depending on the microsimulation model used. Sensitivity analyses showed that if relative adherence to CTC screening was 25% higher than adherence to other tests, it could be cost-effective if reimbursed at $488 per scan.
CONCLUSIONS: CTC could be a cost-effective option for colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees if the reimbursement rate per scan is substantially less than that for colonoscopy or if a large proportion of otherwise unscreened persons were to undergo screening by CTC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664028      PMCID: PMC2923219          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  56 in total

1.  Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Naveen N Kumar; Suchitra Godara; Janice A Casamina; Robert Hom; Gregory Galdino; Peter Dell; Darice Liu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quality of life in survivors of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; M R Andersen; R Etzioni; C Moinpour; S Peacock; A Potosky; N Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Joan L Warren; Kevin Knopf; William W Davis; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?

Authors:  M Thomeer; D Bielen; D Vanbeckevoort; S Dymarkowski; A Gevers; P Rutgeerts; M Hiele; E Van Cutsem; G Marchal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt; Perry Pickhardt; Andrea Laghi; Daniel H Kim; Daniel Kim; Angelo Zullo; Franco Iafrate; Lorenzo Di Giulio; Sergio Morini
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-14

9.  The incidence of colorectal cancer following a negative screening sigmoidoscopy: implications for screening interval.

Authors:  V Paul Doria-Rose; Theodore R Levin; Joe V Selby; Polly A Newcomb; Kathryn E Richert-Boe; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Cancer prevention health services research: an emerging field.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Jennifer H Tektiridis; Ning Zhang; Robert M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Computational modeling and multilevel cancer control interventions.

Authors:  Joseph P Morrissey; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Rebecca Anhang Price; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

4.  Outcomes research in gastroenterology and endoscopy.

Authors:  Parantap Gupta; Jonathan M Buscaglia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

5.  Re: Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  How should individuals with a false-positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer be managed? A decision analysis.

Authors:  Ulrike Haug; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Kwang Pyo Kim; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Judy Yee; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Christine D Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Jennifer M Weiss; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.