Literature DB >> 2070706

Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk men.

P G Foutch1, H Mai, K Pardy, J A DiSario, R K Manne, D Kerr.   

Abstract

Asymptomatic men (N = 114) 50 years of age or older had screening for colorectal neoplasia with flexible sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy regardless of the sigmoidoscopic result. Our study objective was to determine the prevalence of patients having isolated adenomatous polyps in a proximal colonic segment in the absence of a distal index neoplasm within reach of the sigmoidoscope. Through the combined use of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, adenomatous polyps were detected in 47 of 114 individuals (41%). A total of 88 adenomas was found. Seventeen patients had isolated neoplasms in proximal colonic segments in the absence of distal adenomas. These patients represented 15% of screened subjects (17 of 114) and 20% of individuals who lacked adenomas on sigmoidoscopy (17 of 84). The majority of proximal neoplasms were small (less than 1.0 cm), tubular adenomas. Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for screening asymptomatic men for neoplasia. However, it remains to be determined if a 20% miss rate (for those with a normal sigmoidoscopic examination) is significant and whether small proximal adenomas are worth finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070706     DOI: 10.1007/BF01297142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  28 in total

Review 1.  US Preventive Services Task Force. Sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The epidemiology of colorectal polyps: prevalence in New Orleans and international comparisons.

Authors:  P Correa; J P Strong; A Reif; W D Johnson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Clinical competence in colonoscopy. Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  E Achkar; W Carey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The management of patients with colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  R Lambert; L H Sobin; J D Waye; G A Stalder
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Polyps of the large intestine in Northern Norway.

Authors:  T J Eide; H Stalsberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Screening for colorectal neoplasms. A comparison of the fecal occult blood test and endoscopic examination.

Authors:  G Letsou; G H Ballantyne; M J Zdon; K A Zucker; I M Modlin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Screening for colorectal cancer in a Hungarian county.

Authors:  L Ujszászy; G Prónay; G Nagy; J Kovács; J Libor; K Minik
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; F W Smith
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Pathology of colorectal adenomas: a colonoscopic survey.

Authors:  F Konishi; B C Morson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  12 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening coverage in Greece. PACMeR 02.01 study collaboration.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamposioras; Davide Mauri; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Georgios Ferentinos; Georgios Zacharias; Apostolos Xilomenos; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Magdalini Bristianou; Dimitra Chasioti; Athanasios Milousis; Angeliki Vittoraki; Georgios Koukourakis; Ioanna Chatziioannou; Panagiotis Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer and suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  G Stevenson
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as a screening modality for colorectal adenomas in older age groups? Findings in a cohort of the normal population aged 63-72 years.

Authors:  E Thiis-Evensen; G S Hoff; J Sauar; B M Majak; M H Vatn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  The Association between Distal Findings and Proximal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jason L W Huang; Y H Wang; Johnny Y Jiang; C P Yu; Y L Wu; P Chen; X Q Yuan; Harry H X Wang; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP).

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Sandeep Vijan; Inku Hwang; John Inadomi; Roy K H Wong; J Richard Choi; John Napierkowski; Jonathan M Koff; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

10.  Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Christina M Robinson; Julia E Weiss
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.