Literature DB >> 4064886

Spatial tuning of the pattern ERG across temporal frequency.

T Berninger, R P Schuurmans.   

Abstract

The spatial response function of the electroretinogram (ERG) to contrast checkerboard pattern reversal at several check sizes was determined at a fixed contrast. The influence of the rate of modulation on the spatial response function was assessed. Reversing square wave patterns were presented at eight temporal frequencies ranging from 1 to 25 reversals per sec. The waveform consisted of an initial positive and a subsequent negative deflection. Irrespective of the temporal frequency, the spatial response function of the positive component did not show a spatial tuning. The amplitude of the negative component exhibited a pronounced attenuation of the response at check sizes larger than optimal. Mean maximal amplitude was found at an optimal check size between 25 and 50 min of arc. A distinction between a positive or negative component was not made for temporal frequencies higher than 10 reversals per sec, since the waveform at these modulation rates consisted merely of a sinusoidal steady-state response. The spatial response function obtained at 14 reversals per sec, resembling that of the negative component, exhibited a prominent spatial tuning. The results demonstrate that the pattern ERG has at least two components: a positive component which is not specific to changes in retinal distribution of contrast, followed by a negative wave showing spatial tuning across temporal frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4064886     DOI: 10.1007/BF00143211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A gold foil electrode: extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography.

Authors:  G B Arden; R M Carter; C Hogg; I M Siegel; S Margolis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Comparison of the spatial response properties of the human retina and cortex as measured by simultaneously recorded pattern ERGs and VEPs.

Authors:  S Sokol; K Jones; D Nadler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatio-temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; J G Robson; D E Schweitzer-Tong; A B Watson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Luminance and contrast responses recorded in man and cat.

Authors:  R P Schuurmans; T Berninger
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Human pattern-evoked retinal responses are altered by optic atrophy.

Authors:  W W Dawson; T M Maida; M L Rubin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Human fast retinal potentials and the spatial properties of a visual stimulus.

Authors:  M Korth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  25 in total

1.  Visual prognostic value of the pattern electroretinogram in chiasmal compression.

Authors:  D N Parmar; A Sofat; R Bowman; J R Bartlett; G E Holder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  E O'Donaghue; G B Arden; F O'Sullivan; F Falcão-Reis; B Moriarty; R A Hitchings; W Spilleers; C Hogg; G Weinstein
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Pattern reversal ERG and VEP--comparison of stimulation by LED, monitor and a Maxwellian-view system.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Sylvia Rühl; Andrea Peters; Anselm Jünemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Differences between pattern onset and pattern reversal retinal responses.

Authors:  M Korth; R Rix
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Separable evoked retinal and cortical potentials from each major visual pathway: preliminary results.

Authors:  T A Berninger; G B Arden; C R Hogg; T Frumkes
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Pattern electroretinogram: effects of reference electrode position.

Authors:  J V Odom; T M Maida; W W Dawson; R Hobson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Check size and defocusing effects on equipotential maps of pattern-evoked electroretinograms.

Authors:  E Adachi-Usami; N Kuroda; Y Kakisu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Retinal receptive fields under different adaptation levels studied with pattern-evoked ERG.

Authors:  M Korth; S Ilschner; O Sembritzki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  A 43-year-old man with reduced visual acuity and normal fundus: occult macular dystrophy--case report.

Authors:  Wojciech Lubiński; Wojciech Gosławski; Krzysztof Penkala; Monika Drobek-Słowik; Danuta Karczewicz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations.

Authors:  E Dodt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.