Literature DB >> 3382566

Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients.

R Danielsen1, J E Nordrehaug, L Stangeland, H Vik-Mo.   

Abstract

Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography was performed before cardiac catheterisation in 69 consecutive patients with suspected aortic stenosis. Agreement between the maximum and the mean Doppler gradients and catheterisation gradients was good. Doppler echocardiography, however, systematically underestimated the maximum and mean gradients, particularly in the high range. Stepwise regression analysis of the small pressure difference between the two methods showed that it could not be explained by age, sex, stroke volume, differences in heart rate, ejection fraction, the presence of coronary artery disease, or severity of aortic regurgitation. There was a negative curvilinear correlation between the maximum and mean Doppler gradients and the aortic valve areas that were measured at catheterisation in patients with pure aortic stenosis. The degree of correlation decreased when patients with concomitant aortic regurgitation were included. The scatter of gradients above and below the correlation line was large and this was caused by low and high transvalvar flow. These results show that the usefulness of Doppler gradients for judging the severity of aortic stenosis, both in relation to immediate diagnosis and follow up, is severely limited if transvalvar flow is not taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3382566      PMCID: PMC1276895          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.59.5.551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  14 in total

1.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods.

Authors:  J W Kennedy; S E Trenholme; I S Kasser
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  T Skjaerpe; L Hegrenaes; L Hatle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output using the mitral orifice method.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Nitter-Hauge; H Ihlen; E Myhre
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02

5.  Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.

Authors:  J F Lewis; L C Kuo; J G Nelson; M C Limacher; M A Quinones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  L Hegrenaes; L Hatle
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-10

7.  Clinical value of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of adults with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  I A Simpson; A B Houston; C D Sheldon; I Hutton; T D Lawrie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-06

8.  Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  C H Croft; K Lipscomb; K Mathis; B G Firth; P Nicod; G Tilton; M D Winniford; L D Hillis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

Authors:  P J Currie; J B Seward; G S Reeder; R E Vlietstra; D R Bresnahan; J F Bresnahan; H C Smith; D J Hagler; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Comparison of Doppler-derived pressure gradient to that determined at cardiac catheterization in adults with aortic valve stenosis: implications for management.

Authors:  M Yeager; P G Yock; R L Popp
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  7 in total

1.  Doppler echocardiography in elderly patients with ejection systolic murmurs.

Authors:  G M McKillop; D A Stewart; J M Burns; D Ballantyne
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: masterly inactivity but cat-like observation.

Authors:  J C Vaile; M J Griffith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M J Griffith; C Carey; D J Coltart; B S Jenkins; M M Webb-Peploe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-11

4.  Evaluation of anatomical obstruction by Doppler echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  D E Teien; H Wendel; J Björnebrink; L Ekelund
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-04

5.  The prevalence of aortic stenosis in the elderly in Iceland and predictions for the coming decades: the AGES-Reykjavík study.

Authors:  Ragnar Danielsen; Thor Aspelund; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality.

Authors:  J Bartunek; D De Bacquer; A C Rodrigues; B De Bruyne
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-06

7.  Towards improving the accuracy of aortic transvalvular pressure gradients: rethinking Bernoulli.

Authors:  Benedikt Franke; J Weese; I Waechter-Stehle; J Brüning; T Kuehne; L Goubergrits
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.602

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.