Literature DB >> 10641298

Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.

G P Hanley1, B A Iwata, J S Lindberg.   

Abstract

Individuals who do not possess the verbal skills to express meaningful choice in the absence of its consequences may have difficulty indicating their preference for protracted activities that are unavailable until some time in the future (e.g., taking a walk, riding a bike). When we examined the preferences of 4 individuals with developmental disabilities by showing them pictorial representations of various activities, their initial choices showed no clear preferences. In a subsequent condition, selecting a photograph resulted in brief access to the depicted activity. When selections produced differential consequences (i.e., access to the activity), clear preferences emerged. In addition, 3 individuals' preferences were later shifted to an initially less preferred but more socially desirable option by superimposing additional reinforcement contingencies for engaging in the less preferred activity. Results are discussed in terms of the conditions under which choice functions as an indicator of preference and how those conditions may be altered to improve the quality of choice making without limiting access to preferred options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641298      PMCID: PMC1284206          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  The functional independence of mands and tacts.

Authors:  J Lamarre; J G Holland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments.

Authors:  T S Higbee; J E Carr; C D Harrison
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

4.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.

Authors:  G P Hanley; C C Piazza; W W Fisher; S A Contrucci; K A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

6.  Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.

Authors:  J S Newton; W R Ard; R H Horner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

7.  Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.

Authors:  G Dunlap; M dePerczel; S Clarke; D Wilson; S Wright; R White; A Gomez
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  Teaching nonvocal communication skills to multihandicapped retarded adults.

Authors:  D H Reid; B Hurlbut
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

10.  A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.

Authors:  J Northup; T George; K Jones; C Broussard; T R Vollmer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996
View more
  13 in total

1.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Rachel H Thompson; Jana S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2010

4.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

5.  The effects of providing access to stimuli following choice making during vocal preference assessments.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tessing; Deborah A Napolitano; David B McAdam; Anthony DiCesare; Saul Axelrod
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

6.  Progressing toward data intimacy: a review of within-session data analysis.

Authors:  Tara A Fahmie; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

7.  Influencing preschoolers' free-play activity preferences: an evaluation of satiation and embedded reinforcement.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Jeffrey H Tiger; Einar T Ingvarsson; Anthony P Cammilleri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

8.  Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  Katie Snyder; Thomas S Higbee; Elizabeth Dayton
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

9.  Advance Notice for Transition-Related Problem Behavior: Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Adam T Brewer; Kathleen Strickland-Cohen; Wesley Dotson; D Courtney Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2014-08-19

10.  Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Melissa C Goldberg; Melissa J Allman; Louis P Hagopian; Mandy M Triggs; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Stewart H Mostofsky; Martha B Denckla; Iser G DeLeon
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2016-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.