Literature DB >> 15154215

Effects of task difficulty and type of contingency on students' allocation of responding to math worksheets.

Amanda L Lannie1, Brian K Martens.   

Abstract

This study investigated students' allocation of responding as a function of task difficulty and type of reinforcement contingency (i.e., accuracy based or time based). Four regular education fourth-grade students were presented with two identical stacks of easy and then difficult math worksheets using a reversal design. Regardless of condition, completing problems from each stack of worksheets was reinforced according to a different contingency; one required correct completion of math problems (accuracy based) and one required on-task behavior (time based). Results suggested that 3 of the 4 students preferred the accuracy-based contingency when given easy material and the time-based contingency when given difficult material. One student allocated more responding to the accuracy-based contingency when given easy problems but did not show a clear preference for either contingency with difficult problems. The implications of these findings for designing reinforcement-based programs for tasks of varying difficulty are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154215      PMCID: PMC1284477          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

3.  Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance.

Authors:  T Ayllon; M D Roberts
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974

4.  Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.

Authors:  N A Neef; F C Mace; D Shade
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

5.  Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.

Authors:  N A Neef; D Shade; M S Miller
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

6.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

7.  The effects of magnitude and quality of reinforcement on choice responding during play activities.

Authors:  Hannah Hoch; Jennifer J McComas; LeAnn Johnson; Nicky Faranda; Shayna L Guenther
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

8.  Karyotypic evolution of a murine mammary adenocarcinoma in vitro and during progression from primary to metastatic growth in vivo.

Authors:  B E Elliott; W Xu; K Mudrik; J Marshall; M Vekemans; J J Holden
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.

Authors:  J Northup; T George; K Jones; C Broussard; T R Vollmer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Authors:  Justin D Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-30

2.  Sensitivity and bias under conditions of equal and unequal academic task difficulty.

Authors:  Derek D Reed; Brian K Martens
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.