Literature DB >> 4042472

Patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy with a revised objective rating system.

L D Herron, J Turner.   

Abstract

A revised objective rating system for patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy in the treatment of disc herniation is presented. Based on the severity of the findings within each of four categories (neurologic signs, root tension signs, myelogram or CT scan findings, and psychosocial environment), numerical scores are derived. A maximum score of 25 points is available in each category, for a total of 100 points. The objective rating score was determined prospectively in 106 patients who were treated by laminectomy for lumbar disc herniation and who were evaluated at least one year after surgery. The rating score was highly predictive of the surgical result. Application of this system for patient selection would reduce reliance on much of the subjective interpretation of physical and radiographic findings. With appropriate patient selection, improved surgical results are possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4042472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Failed lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  S Dhar; R W Porter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Assessing the outcome of a back school program for the prevention of chronic pain by behavioral observation-methodology and evaluation.].

Authors:  M Basten; H D Basler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica.

Authors:  M J Albeck
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  An analysis of the prognostic factors affecing the clinical outcomes of conventional lumbar open discectomy : clinical and radiological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Min-Soo Kim; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-30

6.  The value of accurate clinical assessment in the surgical management of the lumbar disc protrusion.

Authors:  R S Kerr; T A Cadoux-Hudson; C B Adams
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Efficacy of lumbar discectomy and percutaneous treatments for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  C D Stevens; R W Dubois; T Larequi-Lauber; J P Vader
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1997

9.  Evaluation of standard nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation using the Love method: results of follow-up studies after more than 10 years.

Authors:  Yasuo Saruhashi; Kanji Mori; Akitomo Katsuura; Shinobu Takahashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue; Sinsuke Hukuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Predicting the outcome of diskectomy.].

Authors:  C Herda; T Wirth; H D Basler; I Florin; P Griss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.