Literature DB >> 22012528

Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Jeffrey A Rihn1, Alan S Hilibrand, Kristen Radcliff, Mark Kurd, Jon Lurie, Emily Blood, Todd J Albert, James N Weinstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine if the duration of symptoms affects outcomes following the treatment of intervertebral lumbar disc herniation.
METHODS: An as-treated analysis was performed on patients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) for the treatment of intervertebral lumbar disc herniation. Randomized and observational cohorts were combined. A comparison was made between patients who had had symptoms for six months or less (n = 927) and those who had had symptoms for more than six months (n = 265). Primary and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and at regular follow-up intervals up to four years. The treatment effect for each outcome measure was determined at each follow-up period for the duration of symptoms for both groups.
RESULTS: At all follow-up intervals, the primary outcome measures were significantly worse in patients who had had symptoms for more than six months prior to treatment, regardless of whether the treatment was operative or nonoperative. When the values at the time of the four-year follow-up were compared with the baseline values, patients in the operative treatment group who had had symptoms for six months or less had a greater increase in the bodily pain domain of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (mean change, 48.3 compared with 41.9; p < 0.001), a greater increase in the physical function domain of the SF-36 (mean change, 47.7 compared with 41.2; p < 0.001), and a greater decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score (mean change, -41.1 compared with -34.6; p < 0.001) as compared with those who had had symptoms for more than six months (with higher scores indicating less severe symptoms on the SF-36 and indicating more severe symptoms on the Oswestry Disability Index). When the values at the time of the four-year follow-up were compared with the baseline values, patients in the nonoperative treatment group who had had symptoms for six months or less had a greater increase in the bodily pain domain of the SF-36 (mean change, 31.8 compared with 21.4; p < 0.001), a greater increase in the physical function domain of the SF-36 (mean change, 29.5 compared with 22.6; p = 0.015), and a greater decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score (mean change, -24.9 compared with -18.5; p = 0.006) as compared with those who had had symptoms for more than six months. Differences in treatment effect between the two groups related to the duration of symptoms were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased symptom duration due to lumbar disc herniation is related to worse outcomes following both operative and nonoperative treatment. The relative increased benefit of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment was not dependent on the duration of the symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22012528      PMCID: PMC5515548          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  43 in total

1.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; W C Peul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-06-23

Review 3.  Results of surgery compared with conservative management for lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  F Postacchini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  N Vucetic; P Astrand; P Güntner; O Svensson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Harry Herkowitz; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Keith Bridwell; Michael Longley; Gunnar B Andersson; Emily A Blood; Margaret R Grove; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy with a revised objective rating system.

Authors:  L D Herron; J Turner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered?

Authors:  Ralf D Rothoerl; Chris Woertgen; Alexander Brawanski
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L C L Ng; P Sell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05
View more
  33 in total

1.  Cohort study of lumbar percutaneous chemonucleolysis using ethanol gel in sciatica refractory to conservative treatment.

Authors:  Sébastien Touraine; Joël Damiano; Olivia Tran; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees; Matthew Geck; John K Stokes; Devender Singh
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2016-01-27

3.  Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections.

Authors:  Enrique Pena; Lee Moroz; Devender Singh
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 4.  Does surgical timing influence functional recovery after lumbar discectomy? A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights(®): Recurrent Versus Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: Patient-reported Outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Prognostic Value of Impaired Preoperative Ankle Reflex in Surgical Outcome of Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Hasankhani Eg; Atefe Zare
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-01

7.  Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Which Variables Are Associated With Patient-reported Outcomes After Discectomy? Review of SPORT Disc Herniation Studies.

Authors:  John D Koerner; Jordan Glaser; Kristen Radcliff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Stratified versus usual care for the management of primary care patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC RCT.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Kika Konstantinou; Martyn Lewis; Reuben Ogollah; Benjamin Saunders; Jesse Kigozi; Sue Jowett; Bernadette Bartlam; Majid Artus; Jonathan C Hill; Gemma Hughes; Christian D Mallen; Elaine M Hay; Danielle A van der Windt; Michelle Robinson; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy: what factors predict treatment failure?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; M Jake Carlson; James Rainville
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.