Literature DB >> 9499468

Efficacy of lumbar discectomy and percutaneous treatments for lumbar disc herniation.

C D Stevens1, R W Dubois, T Larequi-Lauber, J P Vader.   

Abstract

The changing health care environment necessitates careful re-evaluation of all costly elective procedures. Low back surgery is a typical example. This article reviews the current literature addressing the efficacy of surgery and invasive percutaneous treatments for discogenic sciatica. It also discusses the prospects for the continuation of reimbursement for these procedures under a system of managed health care. Relevant articles were identified using the MEDLINE and Current Contents databases, from bibliographies of articles identified from these databases, from recommendations of experts in the field, and from the Canadian Cochrane++ Collaboration. The review includes randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, published practice guidelines and large case series. The literature is classified and discussed in these quality strata. The review includes 9 randomized trials, 6 meta-analyses or review articles, one evidence-based practice guideline, 38 surgical case series and 35 additional references. Though incomplete, the existing evidence indicates that open discectomy shortens the duration of discogenic sciatica in selected patients. Neurologic outcomes are similar in operated and unoperated patients. Predominant leg pain, evidence of nerve root tension and concordant symptoms and imaging findings, are associated with favorable surgical results. Chemonucleolysis is also associated with more rapid pain relief than conservative treatment, but provides less certain benefit than standard discectomy. Available data on other percutaneous disc treatments do not currently support a statement on efficacy. Various percutaneous techniques are available but there is no solid scientific evidence of efficacy. The benefits of open discectomy, principally reduced duration of pain, appear to justify its use in carefully selected patients when discogenic sciatica fails to improve with conservative measures. Though elective, the procedure will probably continue to be available under managed care, but with increasing scrutiny of operative indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9499468     DOI: 10.1007/BF01318612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soz Praventivmed        ISSN: 0303-8408


  86 in total

Review 1.  What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?

Authors:  R A Deyo; J Rainville; D L Kent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medicine, money, and mathematics.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  1992-06

3.  A prospective randomized trial of chemonucleolysis and conventional disc surgery in single level lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  K P Muralikuttan; A Hamilton; W G Kernohan; R A Mollan; I V Adair
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Percutaneous laser disc decompression. A new therapeutic modality.

Authors:  D S Choy; P W Ascher; H S Ranu; S Saddekni; D Alkaitis; W Liebler; J Hughes; S Diwan; P Altman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Utilization of medical services for the treatment of acute low back pain: conformance with clinical guidelines.

Authors:  W S Schroth; J M Schectman; E G Elinsky; J C Panagides
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  J A Turner; M Ersek; L Herron; R Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K E Johnsson; I Rosén; A Udén
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Lumbosacral spine imaging: physioanatomic method.

Authors:  P R Luers
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

10.  Restriction of indication for automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy based on computed tomographic discography.

Authors:  W H Castro; J Jerosch; R Hepp; K P Schulitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 2.  A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Alberto Gotfryd; Osmar Avanzi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.