Literature DB >> 3346682

The value of accurate clinical assessment in the surgical management of the lumbar disc protrusion.

R S Kerr1, T A Cadoux-Hudson, C B Adams.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with lumbar disc protrusions were studied. Thirty six "control" patients were admitted in the same time period with low back pain and sciatica but with subsequently "normal" myelograms and no surgery. The aim of this paper was to relate history and clinical signs to the myelograms and surgical findings. Ninety nine per cent of our patients presented with sciatica (controls 94%). The most frequently found sign in patients with a disc protrusion was reduction of ipsilateral straight leg raising (98%). However, 55% of controls also showed this sign. There were three signs that, when present, particularly indicated a disc protrusion; "crossed straight leg raising" (pain on contralateral straight leg raising), measured calf wasting and impaired ankle reflex: the latter being especially indicative of an L5-S1 disc protrusion. There were two further important signs, weakness of dorsiflexion of the foot and scoliosis of the lumbar spine. However, such signs occurred in about half the patients and so clinical diagnosis in the remaining half depended on obtaining a good history of sciatica, and paying due regard to severity of the pain, the mobility of the patient, the ability and desire to work and the overall personality. Satisfactory results of surgery simply depend on finding and removing a definite disc protrusion. Using these methods of selection, 98% have returned to their original employment, 86% within 3 months of the operation. For a patient with no abnormal signs and a normal myelogram, surgical treatment should not be advised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3346682      PMCID: PMC1031525          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.51.2.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  10 in total

1.  The long-term effects of wide laminectomy for lumbar disc excision. A review of 130 patients.

Authors:  R K Jackson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1971-11

2.  The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2,504 operations.

Authors:  E V Spangfort
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1972

3.  Lasègue's sign in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  E Sprangfort
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1971

4.  The problem of sciatica.

Authors:  J Bartlett
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1970-04

5.  Analysis of failures and poor results of lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  C A Fager; S R Freidberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A lumbar disc surgery predictive score card.

Authors:  B E Finneson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy with a revised objective rating system.

Authors:  L D Herron; J Turner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I).

Authors:  M Kosteljanetz; J O Espersen; H Halaburt; T Miletic
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  The radiographic evaluation of the symptomatic postoperative lumbar spine patient.

Authors:  S E Byrd; M L Cohn; S L Biggers; C T Huntington; G E Locke; M F Charles
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Symptoms and signs of sciatica and their relation to the localization of the lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  P Kortelainen; J Puranen; E Koivisto; S Lähde
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Differential diagnosis and management of an older runner with an atypical neurodynamic presentation: a case for clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Jonathan Sylvain; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

3.  The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; James Rainville; Jeffrey N Katz; Cristin Jouve; Carol Hartigan; Janet Limke; Enrique Pena; Ling Li; Bryan Swaim; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Role of conventional lumbar myelography in the management of sciatica: An experience from Pakistan.

Authors:  Ahmed Bakhsh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-01

5.  Impact of coexistent lumbar spine disorders on clinical outcomes and physician charges associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Linda R Van Dillen; Steven M Kymes; Melissa A Armbrecht; Dustin Stwalley; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression.

Authors:  P C A J Vroomen; M C T F M de Krom; J T Wilmink; A D M Kester; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Charles E Rainey
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04

8.  Clinical correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with symptom complex in prolapsed intervertebral disc disease: A cross-sectional double blind analysis.

Authors:  Jeetendra Bajpai; Sumit Saini; Rakhi Singh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Lumbar herniated disc: spontaneous regression.

Authors:  Idiris Altun; Kasım Zafer Yüksel
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2016-12-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.