Literature DB >> 8686523

A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica.

M J Albeck1.   

Abstract

The diagnostic power or clinical parameters in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation in patients with monoradicular pain was evaluated in a prospective study with a 100% verification of the diagnosis. Eighty patients with monoradicular pain corresponding to the fifth lumbar or the first sacral nerve root were included. Pre-operatively a number of clinical parameters were recorded and compared to the intra-operative finding of a disc herniation. The parameters were analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results from the available literature were analysed by ROC curves for comparison. In 76% of the cases a disc herniation was discovered. The level of the disc herniation was correctly predicted in 93% of these cases by the location of the pain alone or supplemented by neurological signs. Apart from radicularly distributed pain, all parameters in the present study and in the literature had no or low diagnostic accuracy. Thus, in patients with monoradicular sciatica further clinical parameters do not add to the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8686523     DOI: 10.1007/bf01411722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  26 in total

Review 1.  What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?

Authors:  R A Deyo; J Rainville; D L Kent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Lower-extremity sensibility testing in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  M D Weise; S R Garfin; R H Gelberman; M M Katz; R P Thorne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The level-diagnosis of a lower lumbar disc herniation: the value of sensibility and motor testing.

Authors:  O H Jensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States.

Authors:  R A Deyo; Y J Tsui-Wu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Back pain and trunk list.

Authors:  R W Porter; C G Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  R M Centor; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Induced pain patterns on passive straight-leg raising in lower lumbar disc protrusion. A prospective clinical, myelographic and operative study in fifty patients.

Authors:  M A Edgar; W M Park
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1974-11

8.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Patient selection for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy with a revised objective rating system.

Authors:  L D Herron; J Turner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Pain drawing and myelography in sciatic pain.

Authors:  A Udén; L A Landin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sidney M Rubinstein; Jan J M Pool; Maurits W van Tulder; Ingrid I Riphagen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Eva Brosjö; Hans Billing; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Trond Iversen; Tore K Solberg; Bertil Romner; Tom Wilsgaard; Øystein Nygaard; Knut Waterloo; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nassib Tawa; Anthea Rhoda; Ina Diener
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Correlation of clinical presentation with intraoperative level diagnosis in lower lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hamed Reihani-Kermani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.