Literature DB >> 4030696

Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus in a comparison of the growth efficiencies of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobes.

L S Lacis, H G Lawford.   

Abstract

Maintenance coefficients and theoretical maximum growth yields, with respect to both substrate and ATP, were estimated for Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus growing in a glucose-limited, continuous culture. A comparison of these values with those for other bacteria showed that, contrary to predictions by others, anaerobic thermophiles had neither low observed growth yields nor high maintenance energy coefficients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4030696      PMCID: PMC219273          DOI: 10.1128/jb.163.3.1275-1278.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  12 in total

1.  Energetics of Microbacterium thermosphactum in glucose-limited continuous culture.

Authors:  B J Hitchener; A F Egan; P J Rogers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Energetic aspects of anaerobic growth of Aerobacter aerogenes in complex medium.

Authors:  A H Stouthamer; C W Bettenhaussen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1976-12-01       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Comparison of maintenance energy expenditures and growth yields among several rumen bacteria grown on continuous culture.

Authors:  J B Russell; R L Baldwin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of varying the carbon source limiting growth on yield and maintenance characteristics of Escherichia coli in continuous culture.

Authors:  W P Hempfling; S E Mainzer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Effects of growth temperature on yield and maintenance during glucose-limited continuous culture of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S E Mainzer; W P Hempfling
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures.

Authors:  S J Pirt
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-10-12

7.  Molar growth yields and fermentation balances of Lactobacillus casei L3 in batch cultures and in continuous cultures.

Authors:  W de Vries; W M Kapteijn; E G van der Beek; A H Stouthamer
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1970-11

8.  The effect of growth conditions on respiratory activity and growth efficiency in facultative anaerobes grown in chemostat culture.

Authors:  D E Harrison; J E Loveless
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1971-09

9.  Effect of growth rate and glucose concentration on the activity of the phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system in Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt grown in continuous culture.

Authors:  D C Ellwood; P J Phipps; I R Hamilton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Determination of the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation in continuous cultures of Aerobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  A H Stouthamer; C W Bettenhaussen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1975-03-10       Impact factor: 2.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Strain selection in carbon-limited chemostats affects reproducibility of Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus fermentations.

Authors:  L S Lacis; H G Lawford
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus Growth and Product Yield from Elevated Levels of Xylose or Glucose in Continuous Cultures.

Authors:  L S Lacis; H G Lawford
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Fermentation of Cellulosic Substrates in Batch and Continuous Culture by Clostridium thermocellum.

Authors:  L R Lynd; H E Grethlein; R H Wolkin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  High-affinity maltose binding and transport by the thermophilic anaerobe Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus 39E.

Authors:  C R Jones; M Ray; K A Dawson; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.