Literature DB >> 2242493

Vertebral cortical bone mass measurement by a new quantitative computer tomography method: correlations with vertebral trabecular bone measurements.

R Pacifici1, R C Rupich, L V Avioli.   

Abstract

Previous studies comparing axial and appendicular skeleton have shown that trabecular bone loss is greater than cortical bone loss. However, whether the same difference exists between the trabecular and the cortical compartments of the vertebral body remains to be determined. In this study, we used quantitative computer tomography (QCT) to simultaneously measure the cortical rim of the vertebral body as well as trabecular bone. In 99 Caucasian women (mean age 53.8 +/- 13.0 years, range 26-79 years) we found a significant correlation between cortical mineral content (BMCC) and both single (SE) and dual energy (DE) trabecular mineral content (BMCT) (r = 0.62, P less than 0.0001 for both regressions). The cross-sectional rates of bone loss per year were 1.32%, 1.16%, and 0.59% for SE-BMCT, DE-BMCT, and BMCC, respectively. BMCC decreased at a rate that was 45-51% that of SE-BMCT and DE-BMCT, respectively. Our results indicate that (1) QCT may provide a useful means to selectively measure cortical density in vertebral bodies; (2) the decrease of cortical density over time in the spine appears to have been underestimated previously by extrapolation from appendicular bone measurements; (3) because measurements of the entire vertebral body (exclusive of the posterior elements) may provide information that is more representative of spine changes with age, a measurement that includes both areas might be more useful than one measuring only the trabecular region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2242493     DOI: 10.1007/bf02555922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Measurement of total body calcium (bone mass) in vivo with the use of total body neutron activation analysis.

Authors:  W B Nelp; H E Palmer; R Murano; K Pailthorp; G M Hinn; C Rich; J L Williams; T G Rudd; J D Denney
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1970-07

3.  The loss of bone with age, osteoporosis, and fractures.

Authors:  H F Newton-John; D B Morgan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of vertebral and peripheral mineral losses in disuse osteoporosis in monkeys.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; D R Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; M A Ganott; G Wyshak; D M Slovik; S H Doppelt; R M Neer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Quantitative histological studies on age changes in bone.

Authors:  M S Dunnill; J A Anderson; R Whitehead
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1967-10

7.  Assessment of metabolic bone diseases by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M L Richardson; H K Genant; C E Cann; B Ettinger; G S Gordan; F O Kolb; U J Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C D Jones; A M Laval-Jeantet; M H Laval-Jeantet; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Single and dual energy tomographic analysis of spinal trabecular bone: a comparative study in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Pacifici; N Susman; P L Carr; S J Birge; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estrogen status and heredity are major determinants of premenopausal bone mass.

Authors:  R Armamento-Villareal; D T Villareal; L V Avioli; R Civitelli
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  The assessment of vertebral bone macroarchitecture with X-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  M J Flynn; D D Cody
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry.

Authors:  S J Edmondston; K P Singer; R E Day; R I Price; P D Breidahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Differential effects of glucocorticoids on cortical appendicular and cortical vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  R F Laan; W C Buijs; L J van Erning; J A Lemmens; F H Corstens; S H Ruijs; L B van de Putte; P L van Riel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Successful treatment of low turnover osteoporosis resulting from prolonged reserpine therapy with intermittent calcitonin and phosphate therapy.

Authors:  R C Armamento-Villareal; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures.

Authors:  V Gilsanz; M L Loro; T F Roe; J Sayre; R Gilsanz; E E Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 14.808

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.