Literature DB >> 3998300

Temporal integration of acoustic signals by the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

R J Dooling, M H Searcy.   

Abstract

Avoidance conditioning and a modified method of limits psychophysical procedure were used to study temporal integration of tone and noise signals in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). Integration of both tone and noise signals can be described by a negative exponential function with a time constant of about 200 ms. At very short durations there were differences in the integration of tone and noise signals. These data are similar to those reported for a number of other vertebrates, including man. Thresholds for two complex natural vocalizations of the budgerigar are similar to those of pure tones of equivalent duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3998300     DOI: 10.1121/1.391835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  A temporal window for lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  On the ability of neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to sense brief appearances of interaural time difference.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Ninad B Kothari; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Nigel C Noriega; Elizabeth A Marshall; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Why longer song elements are easier to detect: threshold level-duration functions in the Great Tit and comparison with human data.

Authors:  Nina U Pohl; Hans Slabbekoorn; Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil; Georg M Klump; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction.

Authors:  R J Dooling; K Okanoya; S D Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

8.  Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

Authors:  JoAnn McGee; Peggy B Nelson; Julia B Ponder; Jeffrey Marr; Patrick Redig; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Linking the sender to the receiver: vocal adjustments by bats to maintain signal detection in noise.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Holger R Goerlitz; Henrik Brumm; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neurometric amplitude-modulation detection threshold in the guinea-pig ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Christian Füllgrabe; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.