Literature DB >> 23338560

Why longer song elements are easier to detect: threshold level-duration functions in the Great Tit and comparison with human data.

Nina U Pohl1, Hans Slabbekoorn, Heinrich Neubauer, Peter Heil, Georg M Klump, Ulrike Langemann.   

Abstract

Our study estimates detection thresholds for tones of different durations and frequencies in Great Tits (Parus major) with operant procedures. We employ signals covering the duration and frequency range of communication signals of this species (40-1,010 ms; 2, 4, 6.3 kHz), and we measure threshold level-duration (TLD) function (relating threshold level to signal duration) in silence as well as under behaviorally relevant environmental noise conditions (urban noise, woodland noise). Detection thresholds decreased with increasing signal duration. Thresholds at any given duration were a function of signal frequency and were elevated in background noise, but the shape of Great Tit TLD functions was independent of signal frequency and background condition. To enable comparisons of our Great Tit data to those from other species, TLD functions were first fitted with a traditional leaky-integrator model. We then applied a probabilistic model to interpret the trade-off between signal amplitude and duration at threshold. Great Tit TLD functions exhibit features that are similar across species. The current results, however, cannot explain why Great Tits in noisy urban environments produce shorter song elements or faster songs than those in quieter woodland environments, as detection thresholds are lower for longer elements also under noisy conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23338560     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0789-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  41 in total

1.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

2.  A physiological model for the stimulus dependence of first-spike latency of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Mel Brown; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Detection thresholds for brief sounds--are they a measure of auditory intensity integration?

Authors:  K Krumbholz; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.

Authors:  M Florentine; H Fastl; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal summation of loudness: an analysis.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal auditory summation in the echolocating bat, Tadarida brasiliensis.

Authors:  S Schmidt; J Thaller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory temporal integration in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  K N O'Connor; P Barruel; R Hajalilou; M L Sutter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Summing Across Different Active Zones can Explain the Quasi-Linear Ca-Dependencies of Exocytosis by Receptor Cells.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-25
View more
  6 in total

1.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: binaural summation.

Authors:  Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-03

2.  Vocal plasticity in a reptile.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

Authors:  JoAnn McGee; Peggy B Nelson; Julia B Ponder; Jeffrey Marr; Patrick Redig; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Linking the sender to the receiver: vocal adjustments by bats to maintain signal detection in noise.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Holger R Goerlitz; Henrik Brumm; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Anthropogenic noise affects male house wren response to but not detection of territorial intruders.

Authors:  Erin E Grabarczyk; Sharon A Gill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Detection of Near-Threshold Sounds is Independent of EEG Phase in Common Frequency Bands.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Peter Heil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.