Literature DB >> 22232411

Tackling the combined effects of reverberation and masking noise using ideal channel selection.

Oldooz Hazrati1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this article, a new signal-processing algorithm is proposed and evaluated for the suppression of the combined effects of reverberation and noise.
METHOD: The proposed algorithm decomposes, on a short-term basis (every 20 ms), the reverberant stimuli into a number of channels and retains only a subset of the channels satisfying a signal-to-reverberant ratio (SRR) criterion. The construction of this criterion assumes access to a priori knowledge of the target (anechoic) signal, and the aim of this study was to assess the full potential of the proposed channel-selection algorithm, assuming that this criterion could be estimated accurately. Listening tests with normal-hearing listeners were conducted to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm in highly reverberant conditions (T(60) = 1.0 s), which included additive noise at 0 and 5 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
RESULTS: A substantial gain in intelligibility was obtained in both reverberant and combined reverberant and noise conditions. The mean intelligibility scores improved by 44 and 33 percentage points at 0 and 5 dB SNR reverberation + noise conditions. Feature analysis of the consonant confusion matrices revealed that the transmission of voicing information was most negatively affected, followed by manner and place of articulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm produced substantial gains in intelligibility, and this benefit was attributed to the ability of the proposed SRR criterion to detect accurately voiced or unvoiced boundaries. It was postulated that detection of those boundaries is critical for better perception of voicing information and manner of articulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22232411      PMCID: PMC3320694          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0073)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  19 in total

1.  The precedence effect.

Authors:  R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn; W A Yost; S J Guzman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations.

Authors:  Ray L Goldsworthy; Julie E Greenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.

Authors:  Jianfen Ma; Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids.

Authors:  Tim Van den Bogaert; Simon Doclo; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski; F M Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Marcin Wroblewski; Joshua Hajicek; Adrienne Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; T R Letowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1985-05

10.  The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker and reverberation.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Eric M Johnson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Jaewook Lee; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A CAUSAL DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CLASSIFYING PHONEMES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS.

Authors:  Kevin Chu; Leslie Collins; Boyla Mainsah
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2021-05-13

7.  The effects of Lombard perturbation on speech intelligibility in noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Formant priority channel selection for an "n-of-m" sound processing strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.