Literature DB >> 3946500

The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low-socioeconomic population.

T R Moore, W Origel, T C Key, R Resnik.   

Abstract

Reductions in publicly funded prenatal care programs in 1981 to 1984 resulted in an increase in unregistered patient deliveries from 7.8% to 14.9% of births at University of California San Diego Medical Center. To assess the economic and perinatal impact of the increasing number of deliveries of women without prenatal care, 100 consecutive patients with fewer than three prenatal visits were studied. Each "no care" patient was matched by age, parity, and week of delivery with a control patient who received care in a state-funded perinatal project (Comprehensive Perinatal Program). Maternal antenatal risk factors were equally distributed between the two groups when maternal age, parity, history of substance abuse, prior preterm delivery, hypertension, and abortion were compared. Maternal obstetric outcomes were similar, including cesarean section rate and incidence of postpartum fever and hemorrhage. However, neonates delivered of women receiving no care experienced significantly greater morbidity than the neonates of women in the Comprehensive Perinatal Program, including an increased incidence of premature rupture of the membranes and preterm delivery (13% versus 2%, p less than 0.05), low birth weight (21% versus 6% less than 2500 gm, p less than 0.002), and intensive care unit admissions (24% versus 10%, p less than 0.005). When the total inpatient hospital charges were tabulated for each mother-baby pair, the cost of perinatal care for the group receiving no care ($5168 per pair) was significantly higher than the cost for patients in the Comprehensive Perinatal Program ($2974 per pair, p less than 0.001) including an antenatal charge of $600 in the Comprehensive Perinatal Program. The excess cost for delivery of 400 women receiving no care per year in the study hospital was $877,600. These results suggest that extension of prenatal care programs to medically indigent women is likely to result in a net reduction in perinatal morbidity and health care expenditures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3946500     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90387-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Trends and variations in perinatal mortality and low birthweight: the contribution of socio-economic factors.

Authors:  I N Luginaah; K S Lee; T J Abernathy; D Sheehan; G Webster
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Integrating the life course perspective into a local maternal and child health program.

Authors:  Cheri Pies; Padmini Parthasarathy; Samuel F Posner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

3.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of three staffing models for the delivery of low-risk prenatal care.

Authors:  E A Graveley; J H Littlefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth. A case-control study in southern Spain.

Authors:  M Gómez-Olmedo; M Delgado-Rodriguez; A Bueno-Cavanillas; J A Molina-Font; R Gálvez-Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  B Blondel; B Marshall
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire.

Authors:  R D Gorsky; J P Colby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  [Prenatal care of women delivering in the Vaud canton: retrospective study of 854 cases].

Authors:  O Bachelard; B Santos-Eggimann; F Paccaud
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1996

8.  Association between maternal occupational status and utilization of antenatal care Study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Wuerttemberg 1998-2003.

Authors:  Elisabeth Simoes; Siegfried Kunz; Ralf Münnich; Friedrich Wilhelm Schmahl
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Low-birth-weight effects of demographic and socioeconomic variables and prenatal care in Pima County, Arizona.

Authors:  I L Schwartz
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-06

10.  Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes.

Authors:  T S Nesbitt; F A Connell; L G Hart; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.