Literature DB >> 2511163

The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire.

R D Gorsky1, J P Colby.   

Abstract

This study calculates the cost effectiveness of adequate prenatal care in reducing the low birth weight rate for each of three socioeconomic groups of women: those with less than 12 years of education, those with 12 years, and those with more than 12 years. Target low birth weight rates for each group were those actually achieved by New Hampshire women receiving adequate prenatal care within respective education groups. The estimated total cost associated with low birth weight births among the 1981-1984 cohort of New Hampshire resident births was more than $38 million. With universal adequate prenatal care, the low birth weight costs would be less than $32 million, a cost savings of $6.5 million. Since the additional cost of providing adequate prenatal care to all women was estimated to be $2.5 million, the net cost savings were estimated to be $4 million, or $1 million per year. For each additional $1 spent on prenatal care, $2.57 in medical care costs would be saved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2511163      PMCID: PMC1065587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  6 in total

1.  Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation.

Authors:  J A Showstack; P P Budetti; D Minkler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes during the recession: the Washington State experience.

Authors:  E S Fisher; J P LoGerfo; J R Daling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Prenatal care and the low birth weight infant.

Authors:  K J Leveno; F G Cunningham; M L Roark; S D Nelson; M L Williams
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Racial differences in low birth weight. Trends and risk factors.

Authors:  J C Kleinman; S S Kessel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low-socioeconomic population.

Authors:  T R Moore; W Origel; T C Key; R Resnik
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Low-birth-weight rate reduced by the obstetrical access project.

Authors:  J A Lennie; J R Klun; T Hausner
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1987
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Delayed prenatal care and the risk of low birth weight delivery.

Authors:  William J Hueston; Gregory E Gilbert; Lucy Davis; Vanessa Sturgill
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-06

2.  Weighing costs and benefits of adequate prenatal care for 12,023 births in Missouri's Medicaid program, 1988.

Authors:  W F Schramm
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The business case for preconception care: methods and issues.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Sergey V Sotnikov; Sheila Leatherman; Michele Curtis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.