Literature DB >> 9876361

Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

B Blondel1, B Marshall.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Poor attendance to antenatal visits was studied to identify risk factors and to analyse the association with adverse pregnancy outcome.
DESIGN: All poor attenders and a sample of good attenders were compared within three groups of women: women < 20 years, French women > or = 20 years, and foreigners > or = 20 years.
SETTING: 20 French districts including 85,000 births from January to June 1993.
SUBJECTS: 848 poor attenders and 759 good attenders. Poor attenders made fewer than four antenatal visits or began care during or after the sixth month. Good attenders made at least four visits and began care before the sixth month. MAIN
RESULTS: 1.1% of the women were poor attenders. Risk factors for poor attendance were single status and lack of health insurance in the group under 20; young age, high parity, and single status in the French group aged over 20; and single status and lack of health insurance in the foreign group aged over 20. For poor attenders, the odds ratios for preterm delivery were 5.8 (95% CI: 3.2, 10.5) among French women and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.5, 7.4) among foreign women with health insurance. Poor attendance was not associated with poor pregnancy outcome in the group under 20, and among foreign women over 20 without health insurance, but both groups had high rates of preterm delivery and low birth weight.
CONCLUSION: Lack of health insurance is an important barrier to health care during pregnancy. Poor antenatal care is an important risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome among women who have easy access to health care services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9876361      PMCID: PMC1756747          DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.8.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  40 in total

1.  What determines the start of prenatal care? Prenatal care, insurance, and education.

Authors:  J P Cooney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Is routine antenatal care worth while?

Authors:  M H Hall; P K Chng; I MacGillivray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The impact of prenatal care on birth weight. Evidence from an international data set.

Authors:  P J Donaldson; J O Billy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Perinatal and maternal mortality in a religious group avoiding obstetric care.

Authors:  A M Kaunitz; C Spence; T S Danielson; R W Rochat; D A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Some characteristics of antenatal care in 13 European countries.

Authors:  B Blondel; D Pusch; E Schmidt
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-06

6.  Poor antenatal attendance and obstetric performance.

Authors:  J D Keeping; A M Chang; J Morrison; E J Esler
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  [The perinatal situation in France. Trends between 1981 and 1995].

Authors:  B Blondel; G Bréart; C du Mazaubrun; G Badeyan; M Wcislo; A Lordier; N Matet
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1997

8.  The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  G M Ryan; P J Sweeney; A S Solola
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The impact of prenatal care in different social groups.

Authors:  R S Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  21 in total

1.  Trends in prenatal care use and low birthweight in southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Z Goldani; Marco A Barbieri; Antonio A M Silva; Heloisa Bettiol
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Migrant women's utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Heaman; H Bayrampour; D Kingston; B Blondel; M Gissler; C Roth; S Alexander; A Gagnon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

3.  Life course variation in the relation between maternal marital status and preterm birth.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Melissa Tracy; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Changes in the relationship between marriage and preterm birth, 1989-2006.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Improved perinatal health through qualified antenatal care in urban Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Authors:  Mean-Heng Ngy; Keiko Nakamura; Mayumi Ohnishi; Masashi Kizuki; Satoshi Suyama; Kaoruko Seino; Tomoko Inose; Masahiro Umezaki; Masafumi Watanabe; Takehito Takano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Utilization of antenatal care services by a semi-nomadic Bedouin Arab population: evaluation of the impact of a local Maternal and Child Health Clinic.

Authors:  Natalya Bilenko; Rachel Hammel; Ilana Belmaker
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-21

7.  Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Syphilis screening and intervention in 500,000 pregnant women in Shenzhen, the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  J Q Cheng; H Zhou; F C Hong; D Zhang; Y J Zhang; P Pan; Y M Cai
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Synthesized prevention and control of one decade for mother-to-child transmission of syphilis and determinants associated with congenital syphilis and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Shenzhen, South China.

Authors:  J-B Qin; T-J Feng; T-B Yang; F-C Hong; L-N Lan; C-L Zhang; X-L Liu; Y-Z Yang; S-Y Xiao; H-Z Tan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Predictors of inadequate prenatal care in methamphetamine-using mothers in New Zealand and the United States.

Authors:  Min Wu; Linda L Lagasse; Trecia A Wouldes; Amelia M Arria; Tara Wilcox; Chris Derauf; Elana Newman; Rizwan Shah; Lynne M Smith; Charles R Neal; Marilyn A Huestis; Sheri Dellagrotta; Barry M Lester
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.