Literature DB >> 16136357

Association between maternal occupational status and utilization of antenatal care Study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Wuerttemberg 1998-2003.

Elisabeth Simoes1, Siegfried Kunz, Ralf Münnich, Friedrich Wilhelm Schmahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adequate utilization of antenatal care reduces the morbidity of mother and child. How frequent a pregnant woman attends antenatal care is dependent on many factors. The aim of this study was to assess the current influence of educational level and occupational status on maternal utilization of antenatal care under the conditions of an industrialized country and provision of universal coverage.
METHODS: The perinatal database 1998-2003 of the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg (556.948 pregnancies) was studied comparing antenatal care utilization for the different occupational categories obtained in the survey. For statistical analysis descriptive statistics and t test on equity of proportions for independent samples were used.
RESULTS: As occupational groups at risk of insufficient antenatal care unskilled workers, trainees, students, and housewives were identified. High rates of utilization were found for the categories "top management/executive position" and "skilled workers". Rate of one or less consultations per pregnancy has declined significantly compared to 1998, but has increased again since 2000. Low utilization (2-5 consultations per pregnancy) has not decreased, showing rather constant differences between the occupational categories throughout the observed 6-year period. Unskilled workers, trainees, students, and housewives avail less of prenatal care above standard (more than ten consultations per pregnancy).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in an individual woman's use of antenatal care is, besides many other factors, associated with occupational status. Antenatal care promotion should target trainees, students, and unskilled workers prone to insufficient utilization and its consequences, an increase in obstetrical risk. For these groups, the occupational physician may play a key role in reaching the pregnant women on time, as obstetric care reaches them insufficiently and too late. Although housewives are the most numerous group, inhomogeneity regarding their educational level and previous occupational status has to be assumed, calling for further clinical studies to design appropriate interventional concepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16136357     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-005-0020-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  19 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.

Authors:  Nancy E Adler; Katherine Newman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The effect of ambient threats to employment on low birthweight.

Authors:  R Catalano; S Serxner
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1992-12

3.  Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and postpartum hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Simoes; Siegfried Kunz; Margarete Bosing-Schwenkglenks; Friedrich W Schmahl
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Socio-demographic determinants of antenatal care.

Authors:  S Chandrashekar; R S Rao; N S Nair; P R Kutty
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 0.731

5.  [Obstetrics. Prenatal care within the scope of the new quality assurance].

Authors:  F Béguin
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Prenatal screening: current policy in EC countries.

Authors:  M Heringa; H J Huisjes
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution.

Authors:  N E Adler; W T Boyce; M A Chesney; S Folkman; S L Syme
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low-socioeconomic population.

Authors:  T R Moore; W Origel; T C Key; R Resnik
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The impact of prenatal care in different social groups.

Authors:  R S Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Effect of prenatal care on obstetrical outcome.

Authors:  S B Amini; P M Catalano; L I Mann
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun
View more
  1 in total

1.  Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jana Vanden Broeck; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Trudy Klomp; Koen Putman; Katrien Beeckman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.